Maharashtra NEET UG Counselling 2024: Petitioner was denied admission despite being eligible due to mismatch in caste certificates.
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download EBookVagisha Kaushik | December 24, 2024 | 07:58 PM IST
NEW DELHI: Following a Bombay High Court order granting admission to an MBBS aspirant through a supernumerary seat, who was denied admission in Maharashtra’s Sindhudurga Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Medical College over a caste certificate, the state government has asked the National Medical Commission (NMC) to allow the creation of an extra seat for admitting the student.
NEET 2024: Cutoff (OBC, SC, ST & General Category)
NEET 2024 Admission Guidance: Personalised | Study Abroad
NEET 2025: Syllabus | Most Scoring concepts | NEET PYQ's (2015-24)
The petitioner, claiming to belong to the Mali – Other Backward Class (OBC) category, was denied admission to the first-year MBBS course at the college during the stray vacancy round of Maharashtra NEET UG counselling 2024 for the academic year 2024-2025, due to a mismatch in the caste certificates.
“The Hon'ble High Court, Bombay has ordered to grant admission to the petitioner by creating one (1) additional supernumerary seat in Sindhudurga Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Medical College, Dist. Sindhudurg, State of Maharashtra for Academic Year 2024-2025. As the matter of permission or increase in intake capacity is decided by the National Medical Commission, New Delhi, you are requested to do the needful and inform us accordingly. This will enable Respondent No. 5 to complete the admission process of the petitioner in the compliance of Hon'ble High Court, Bombay Order mentioned above,” the director of medical education and research stated in a letter to NMC.
"We welcome the court's intervention in this matter of grave injustice. This is a prime example of how medical colleges in Maharashtra deny admission to meritorious candidates, while the government authorities turn a blind eye. We hope that this judgment propels the authorities into working for the students' interests, not colleges'," said Anand Bapat, a Pune-based activist of Maharashtra Navnirman Vidyarthi Sena, who helped the candidate mount a legal challenge against SSPM College.
The aspirant asserts that she was eligible based on the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) UG results 2024 declared on July 26, 2024. She applied for admission to the college, and her name appeared on the general waiting list.
Among the required documents, the petitioner submitted both a caste certificate and a caste validity certificate. The caste validity certificate, issued by the District Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati, on October 19, 2022, was provided along with the caste certificate from the sub-divisional officer, Morshi, dated August 8, 2024. However, the petitioner was denied admission on the grounds that the date mentioned in the caste certificate did not match the one referenced in the caste validity certificate.
The petitioner’s counsel Priyal Sarda argued that the petitioner belongs to the OBC caste based on the certificate issued to her. The certificate, which confirms her caste status, refers to a specific caste certificate issued in 2021. However, this particular certificate was misplaced, and as a result, the petitioner could not present it. She was unable to obtain a duplicate certificate due to the unavailability of old records. Consequently, the petitioner submitted a fresh certificate.
The counsel for the state Common Entrance Test (CET) cell, argued that the petitioner could not be admitted because the cut-off date had passed and no seats were available. Similarly, the counsel for the college, denied deliberately denying admission, explaining that the petitioner was not admitted due to submitting a different caste certificate instead of the one referenced in the validity certificate. He also pointed out that all seats were filled, so no relief could be granted, and the college denied the petitioner’s allegations.
Granting relief to the petitioner, the court said, “In that view of the matter, it is held that the petitioner is entitled to be admitted at the First Year MBBS Course at the respondent no.7 – College under the Institutional Stray Vacancy by directing creation of a supernumerary seat. The petitioner would be liable to pay tuition fees and other fees as payable by a student who has secured admission in the Institutional Stray Vacancy Round.”
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
AYUSH colleges are already permitted to charge three times the regular fees for management quota seats. Petitioned by Ayurveda colleges, the state government had proposed raising the cap to five times the fee.
Musab Qazi