NEET 2026: Supreme Court clarifies states to close or withdraw FIRs against student protestors
Press Trust of India | August 3, 2026 | 02:27 PM IST | 1 min read
A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana made it clear that the expression "criminal antecedents" referred only to grave and heinous offences
Predict your MBBS, BDS & AYUSH admission chances with the NEET College Predictor. Get personalized college recommendations based on rank, category & quota.
Try NowNEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday clarified that the governments of Delhi and other states can close or withdraw FIRs against students who participated in protests against the NEET paper leak, provided they do not have antecedents involving grave and heinous offences. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana also made it clear that the expression "criminal antecedents" referred only to grave and heinous offences.
At the outset, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the top court that the Union government was serious in its commitment not to pursue FIRs against protesting students except those with criminal antecedents. Mehta said that FIRs against over 2,700 people with antecedents involving grave and heinous offences would not be withdrawn.
During the hearing, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan submitted that even lawyers' children were beaten during the protests.
NEET protests
"The videos are very shocking. We have given 300 videos to the court. Since directions have come from the top, the commissioner of police must look at all this. "Ideally, we have identified un-uniformed individuals committing such police excess. A direction has to go to the Commissioner of police and the RAF director as to why police used pellet guns etc," he said.
The matter is now listed for hearing on August 18. The apex court had earlier said police excesses or a 'lathi charge' cannot be justified merely because there is an agitation and underlined that the right to peaceful protest was "absolutely guaranteed".
The CJP-led march on July 20 in Delhi saw clashes between protesters and security personnel, who used lathis and teargas shells to disperse crowds attempting to move towards Parliament.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
Opposition MPs argued that the anti paper-leak bill 2026 won’t prevent future leaks. On PM Modi’s handling of CJP protest, Gandhi said, ‘change angle of the heart, not camera’
Shradha Chettri | 1 min readFeatured News
]- ‘Leak in education’: Delhi Govt drops land rule, helps 2,000 unrecognised pvt schools get legal sanction
- India added 196 public universities in 15 years, but most barely functional; private ones outnumber them
- ‘SVGU Ahmedabad equipping students to fill industry gaps, look beyond basic qualifications’: Provost
- Mumbai’s Saifee Hospital seeks Rs 125 crore in damages from DNB trainee who attempted suicide
- BHU Admission 2026: BFA candidates stunned by practical exam scores; demand answers and inquiry
- PMS Scholarship: 50% Tamil Nadu schools skipped, thousands of payments delayed, duplicated, finds CAG audit
- ‘Politics minus education’: Why West Bengal colleges are wary of govt-appointed governing body presidents
- 12 DU colleges, just 1 with hostels: Why students are forced into PGs like the one collapsed in Satya Niketan
- Gautam Buddha University student ordered to sign Rs 5-lakh bond over ‘anti-govt propaganda’, CJP protest
- MHT CET: Applications equal seats, illegal EWS admissions, no records – Maharashtra colleges err across board