NEET exam brochure must contain segments for students with disabilities: Supreme Court
Press Trust of India | November 19, 2021 | 12:00 PM IST | 3 mins read
Supreme Court said that the NTA must also train their invigilators who are at the ground level in NEET exam centres as to how should they deal with students with disabilities.
Predict your MBBS, BDS & AYUSH admission chances with the NEET College Predictor. Get personalized college recommendations based on rank, category & quota.
Try Now
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Thursday said the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) examination brochure must contain a specific segment for candidates with disabilities to show what are the benefits available to them. The top court said that the National Testing Agency (NTA) must also train their invigilators who are at the ground level in examination centres as to how should they deal with students with disabilities.
A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna remarked while hearing a plea of a female student suffering from dysgraphia whose grievance was that she was not allowed an additional one-hour for attempting the questions and her answer sheet was snatched by the invigilator.
Also read |
NEET Counselling 2021: MCC releases advisory for medical aspirants
She sought re-examination or to be adequately compensated with grace marks or no negative marking in case of wrong answers. Advocate Rupesh Kumar, appearing for the National Testing Agency, said that it only conducts the examination and declares the results and does not have much control at the ground level.
“We have conducted webinars for the invigilators but still at the ground level, the situation is sometimes unmanageable,” he said, adding that the result for the examination has been declared. Kumar said that it is difficult to conduct the re-examination for one candidate or award her grace marks as the entire merit list will have to be changed after that.
He added that the student had in between the examination told that she needs an extra one hour due to which the invigilator at the Centre could not cross-check the required provision. “Around 16 lakh students have taken the examination and therefore it is difficult to correct the results for one student as the entire merit list will have to be changed. It may also be not appropriate for other students, who may be superseded if she is awarded grace marks,” he said.
The top court agreed that given 16 lakh students taking the examination it would not be appropriate to order re-examination for one student. Advocate Rushabh Vidyarthi, appearing for the student, said that she has secured more than 90 per cent marks in her class 10 and 12 examinations, and with one stroke of a pen of the court, her future may change.
Also read | Disabled MBBS aspirant denied admission in MP medical college: HC seeks reply from NMC
The bench said, “These powers come with great responsibilities. We were discussing this case during the lunch break but you see there are several unseen students, who are not before the court they may be affected if we grant any relief”. The bench said that it will pass orders on the plea and would ask the NTA and NEET to include a specific segment in the examination brochure for students with disabilities and would also ask them to train the invigilators appropriately.
“We are conscious of the fact that this child may lose a year. It was very heart-wrenching. There is a judgement of this court for people with disabilities and the brochure for NEET must have a segment for them attributing what are the benefits available to them. There should be a disclosure in advance for students who are visually impaired dysgraphia and others”, it said.
Also read | UPSC Civil Services Exam: Delhi HC notice on plea seeking unlimited attempts for PwD
The bench said there should be a policy for the students as to how they would be compensated if they are not at fault. “How can one set it right where a candidate is losing out for no fault of his? Medical education is nowadays so competitive. There should be something for them,” the bench said and asked the counsel for the parties to file their written submissions by Friday evening.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- ‘Weaken universities’: Bihar teachers on month-long protest against plan to bring colleges under govt control
- ‘Have seen 8 suicides’: Why hundreds of IIT Delhi B.Tech students are protesting over Rishikesh Kumar’s death
- ‘Cover-up, conflict of interest’: Visva Bharati prof files RTI, VBUFA says facts buried in disciplinary cases
- University of Southampton Delhi to launch 30 courses over next decade, expand to STEM, health, arts: Provost
- Maharashtra’s draft coaching regulation law based on Kota-like centres, will harm small classes: Association
- ‘Cancel admissions’: Jamia Millia students allege lower rank-holders given seats over toppers, protest
- MGR Medical University releases faculty data of 13,000 teaching staff after TN group’s transparency push
- ICAR DDG: ‘NEP rollout priority; multiple entry-exit option helps bring students back to BSc agriculture’
- Removing deprivation points from admissions will change JNU’s character, make it elitist: Professor
- Tamil Nadu plans to strengthen Govt college libraries, polytechnics and diploma engineering courses