Odisha CM suspends former SCERT director, other officials over errors in school textbooks
Vaishnavi Shukla | June 26, 2026 | 06:57 PM IST | 2 mins read
The inquiry committee found serious lapses in school textbooks and recommended SCERT prepare a 'Master Errata Register', provide correct information to all students, and establish a QA Cell
Odisha Textbook Error Row : Odisha chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi has suspended four senior officials, including the former director of the directorate of teacher education and State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT), after large-scale errors were detected in newly published textbooks for Classes 1 to 8.
The action was taken following the report submitted by a high-level inquiry committee headed by Development Commissioner DK Singh.
Besides Manoj Padhi, the former director of the Directorate of Teacher Education and SCERT, the three other suspended officials, all serving as assistant directors, are Pralipta Mishra, Dilip Kumar Sahu, and Bharati Tudu.
Padhi is currently the special secretary in the department of school and mass education.
Besides suspension, disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against six assistant directors, including Manas Kumar Nayak, Vandita Patnaik, Prashant Kumar Sahu, Manas Ranjan Raut, Vinod Mohapatra, and Sudarshan Santhara.
Committee recommends a four-point action plan
The committee, formed after the directions of Odisha CM, recommended a 14-point action plan to improve textbook preparation and prevent such errors in the future.
According to officials, the inquiry committee found serious lapses in content review, fact-checking, and quality control during the preparation and printing of the textbooks.
Accepting the committee's recommendations, the state's chief minister's office (CMO) said SCERT would maintain a master errata register and provide every student with a copy of the corrected content.
The textbooks were prepared by the Directorate of Teacher Education (TE) and the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) as part of curriculum revisions aligned with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
Also read NCERT teaching shame, not respect; blurring of Mohenjo-daro ‘Dancing Girl’ in book draws criticism
QA cell will be set up
A Quality Assurance (QA) Cell will also be set up in SCERT to strengthen the textbook preparation process. The CMO further said no textbook would be sent for printing in the future without mandatory approval of language, images, data, and printing quality.
The other recommendations suggested by the enquiry committee include declaring the corrected PDF version as the official teaching copy, conducting orientation programmes for teachers on revisions, preparing a responsibility matrix for every error, and issuing show-cause notices to the DTP agency, printer and approving authority, followed by appropriate action.
The panel also recommended forming subject-wise Curricular Area Groups and book-specific Textbook Development Committees on the lines of National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) , implementing a four-stage proofing system with a final locked PDF mechanism, creating a Public Errata Portal, prescribing penalties, performance-based scoring and blacklisting of printers and vendors, and conducting pilot testing for every new textbook before publication.
Serious lapses in content
According to a teachers' group, over 1,600 errors were detected in the school textbook for Classes 1 to 8 students, which drew widespread criticism.
Among the errors were describing Isaac Newton as a pilot, misidentifying the Hampi temple as the Konark Sun Temple, and using images of landmarks from other states in the Odisha context.
The errors triggered concern among teachers, parents, and the public as the new academic session began. With inputs from PTI
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Tamil Nadu: Chennai LKG fees highest in state; fee details of thousands of TN private schools public
While many prominent private TN schools are missing from the list, Tamil Nadu has disclosed fees by school, class and district. Here’s what the data does and does not tell you
K. Nitika Shivani | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- ‘Cover-up, conflict of interest’: Visva Bharati prof files RTI, VBUFA says facts buried in disciplinary cases
- University of Southampton Delhi to launch 30 courses over next decade, expand to STEM, health, arts: Provost
- Maharashtra’s draft coaching regulation law based on Kota-like centres, will harm small classes: Association
- ‘Cancel admissions’: Jamia Millia students allege lower rank-holders given seats over toppers, protest
- MGR Medical University releases faculty data of 13,000 teaching staff after TN group’s transparency push
- ICAR DDG: ‘NEP rollout priority; multiple entry-exit option helps bring students back to BSc agriculture’
- Removing deprivation points from admissions will change JNU’s character, make it elitist: Professor
- Tamil Nadu plans to strengthen Govt college libraries, polytechnics and diploma engineering courses
- IIT Delhi cancels classes after MSc student’s suicide sparks protest, demands for deans’ resignation
- ‘No one feels secure’: Jadavpur University ABVP ‘raid’ leaves students scarred, questioning security collapse