Akshay Kumar comments on Mughals in History textbook, told not to read 'Whatsapp forwards'

NEW DELHI: The education ministry needs to take cognisance of the contribution of Hindu kings and “balance” out their stories with those of Mughal emperors who enjoy more space in school texts, Bollywood star Akshay Kumar said on Wednesday. Ahead of the release of his film “Samrat Prithviraj”, a historical action drama based on the warrior Rajput king, Kumar said, “it’s sad we don’t know about our own kings”. "There were only three-four lines about Samrat Prithviraj in the history books that I read. Thanks to this film, I got to know so much about him. I don't think anyone else also knew about him,” Kumar told PTI in an interview.

"When I was talking to my son about him (Prithviraj), he said 'I know about the British empire, Mughal empire, but who's he? So it's a sad thing that we don't know about our own kings. There were only a few lines about Rana Pratap, Rani of Jhansi. But there are a lot of chapters on Mughals," he added. Kumar described his film, which was earlier titled "Prithviraj" and was rechristened last week following protests by the Shree Rajput Karni Sena, as an "educational film set in a commercial way". "I would appeal to the education ministry to try and (bring about) balance and bring our culture, Hindu kings also in our textbooks," Kumar said.

There were staunch responses on Twitter responding to the conversation by the actor in support and against the claims he made. Mohammed Zubair, the co-founder of Alt News responded to the claims by Akshay Kumar through a tweet. He shared a picture of a school history textbook that features Rajput dynasty along with other kingdoms. "Hello @akshaykumar, Not sure if you are talking about India or your home country Canada. In Indian schools they've been teaching about all Prominent Indian Kings," he tweeted.

Hello @akshaykumar, Not sure if you are talking about India or your home country Canada. In Indian schools they've been teaching about all Prominent Indian Kings. pic.twitter.com/1DrfMcvW2C

— Mohammed Zubair (@zoo_bear) June 1, 2022

Ruchika Sharma, a Twitter user who claims to be from JNU calls the conversation ahistorical and and simplistic in a tweet. "This communalisation that Akshay is alluding to by saying #Mughals and "our" kings is also in his movie trailer. Note that this is absolutely ahistorical and simplistic. #Prithviraj was never called "Hindu" in any of his eulogies, neither Ghori as Muslim," she tweeted.

This communalisation that Akshay is alluding to by saying #Mughals and "our" kings is also in his movie trailer. Note that this is absolutely ahistorical and simplistic. #Prithviraj was never called "Hindu" in any of his eulogies, neither Ghori as Muslim https://t.co/CtOsNLfmRf https://t.co/XTkfBtrvgo

— Ruchika Sharma (@tishasaroyan) June 1, 2022

Also read | These BTechs used NPTEL, Udemy, Coursera MOOCs to get new jobs, open research avenues

Kumar also weighed in on the 'north versus south' cinema debate, saying he would rather talk about uniting film industries from across the country than comment on a non-issue. "Both industries are one. The British ruled over us for 200 years using 'Divide and Rule', we are dividing (our country) again by doing all these things. We are India. They are making films in their mother tongue, we are making films in our mother tongue. "We should talk about uniting us. Let’s say, Allu Arjun and I do a film together or Shah Rukh and Vijay are working on a film. Let's wish for such things. Not things like 'They are eating into your (film's) business'," he argued.

Responding to the recent controversy on India’s national language, Kumar said, “All languages are national languages." "I'm happy speaking my mother tongue (Punjabi), I think my mother tongue is the best. A Tamil person thinks his (language) is the best. I don't understand what the debate is about. We are all in one culture, one country. "There was suddenly a roar (furore) about all this and I didn't understand what was wrong with us? After reading so much history, we are still fighting about is 'my language is ok', or 'that language is wrong'. I just believe in just being together," Kumar, who is currently shooting for the Hindi remake of the 2020 Tamil film "Soorarai Pottru", said.

Also read | How state engineering colleges are updating their BTech with internships, training

India doesn’t have a national language. The Eighth Schedule of the Constitution recognises 22 languages. Kumar, who completed three decades in the cinema last year, belting out a series of hits including “Sooryavanshi” and “Bell Bottom”, said he hopes to keep working. "I just want to keep on working till they have to shoot me down. I only know how to do this work. A lot of business opportunities come up but I don't get into them much. I have made some investments into some businesses. That's all I know. "But I can't run a business. There's no point about getting into something one has no knowledge about. In the coming 30 years, I see myself working in this industry. I can't go anywhere else," he added.

Also read | India’s new IAU astronomy centre will assess quality of astronomy education in schools

Kumar was in Delhi to promote his film and paid floral tributes at Qila Rai Pithoragarh, a south Delhi complex housing a statue of Prithviraj Chauhan. "Samrat Prithviraj", produced by Yash Raj Films put out a statement about the name change, and is directed by Chandraprakash Dwivedi. Kumar said he was surprised when Dwivedi, known for directing the 1991 TV show "Chanakya" and the 2003 Partition film "Pinjar", approached him for the project. "I was not sure whether I'll be able to pull this off or not. The way Samrat Prithviraj has been depicted in history books, he's a little stout. I don't match it (the image). But he was confident that according to him, his imagination… he (Prithviraj) was an athletic person. I said let's do it," the 54-year-old actor said.

(with inputs from PTI)