Supreme Court upholds powers of BCI to hold All India Bar Examination
Anu Parthiban | February 10, 2023 | 12:28 PM IST | 2 mins read
SC upheld the powers of BCI and said: "The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment".
Get a structured AIBE Question Paper, detailed answer key, and step-by-step explanations for every question.
Download NowNEW DELHI: Five days after the AIBE XVII (17) exam 2023, the Supreme Court today affirmed the powers of the Bar Council of India to hold the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). Candidates who qualify AIBE will be eligible to practice law in courts of the country.
New: AIBE 21 Provisional Answer key PDF OUT - Direct Link
AIBE 21: Unofficial Answer Key & Solutions: SET-A | SET-B | SET-C | SET-D
AIBE: Complete Exam Guide | Certificate of Practice
Don't Miss: Difference Between AIBE and Judiciary Exams
A five-judge bench comprising Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, AS Oka, Vikram Nath, and J K Maheshwari was hearing petitions challenging the validity of the AIBE exam.
“These are adequate powers to the Bar Council of India (BCI) under the said act (Advocates Act) to provide for such norms and rules. The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment,” said the bench headed by Justice SK Kaul.
The court's order came on a petition which examined several issues concerning the AIBE, including at what stage can the examination be prescribed by the BCI under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Also read | AIBE 17 Exam 2023: BCI constitutes fact finding committee to examine misleading, cheating allegations
The bench had reserved its verdict in September last year after hearing arguments in the matter. The apex court in March 2016 had observed that one of the questions that have been raised for determination was whether the BCI is competent to prescribe an examination post-enrolment of an advocate as a condition of eligibility for his continuing to practice at the Bar.
The apex court had said that the questions that fall for determination are of considerable importance affecting the legal profession in general and need to be authoritatively answered by a Constitution bench.
It had thus referred three questions, including whether pre-enrolment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, could be validly prescribed by the BCI and if so whether the decision in Sudeer vs Bar Council of India & Anr requires reconsideration, for consideration by a five-judge bench.
(With inputs from PTI)
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]CUET UG 2023: NTA increases fees, reduces number of questions; know major changes
The NTA has announced major changes in the CUET 2023 exam pattern, registration fees and number of questions to be attempted in the exam. Know changes here. Registration begins at cuet.samarth.ac.in 2023.
Anu Parthiban | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- IIIT Allahabad fines B.Techs who accept campus placement offers and then take other jobs, allege students
- Tamil Nadu: Chennai LKG fees highest in state; fee details of thousands of TN private schools public
- GMR Aero Technic’s aviation course produces professionals airlines can deploy from day one: President
- No more ‘half-baked doctors’: NMC scraps 2-year PG medical diplomas; over 3,300 seats will go to MD, MS
- MBBS interns seek uniform stipend policy as amounts vary wildly and private medical colleges underpay
- NEET UG 2026 Re-Exam: 20 Goa candidates denied extra 15 minutes at centre, demand inquiry
- ‘Not fashion design’: JK Lakshmipat University focuses on design as tool to solve problems, says director
- Three years on, BUHS has left 2 lakh paramedical students with no exams or results and a bleak future
- NEET Exam: Why more women qualify, top the lists, but still can't make it to AIIMS
- Anna University students piece together BTech courses as faculty gaps lead to fragmented teaching