Supreme Court upholds powers of BCI to hold All India Bar Examination
Anu Parthiban | February 10, 2023 | 12:28 PM IST | 2 mins read
SC upheld the powers of BCI and said: "The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment".
Get a structured AIBE Question Paper, detailed answer key, and step-by-step explanations for every question.
Download NowNEW DELHI: Five days after the AIBE XVII (17) exam 2023, the Supreme Court today affirmed the powers of the Bar Council of India to hold the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). Candidates who qualify AIBE will be eligible to practice law in courts of the country.
A five-judge bench comprising Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, AS Oka, Vikram Nath, and J K Maheshwari was hearing petitions challenging the validity of the AIBE exam.
“These are adequate powers to the Bar Council of India (BCI) under the said act (Advocates Act) to provide for such norms and rules. The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment,” said the bench headed by Justice SK Kaul.
The court's order came on a petition which examined several issues concerning the AIBE, including at what stage can the examination be prescribed by the BCI under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Also read | AIBE 17 Exam 2023: BCI constitutes fact finding committee to examine misleading, cheating allegations
The bench had reserved its verdict in September last year after hearing arguments in the matter. The apex court in March 2016 had observed that one of the questions that have been raised for determination was whether the BCI is competent to prescribe an examination post-enrolment of an advocate as a condition of eligibility for his continuing to practice at the Bar.
The apex court had said that the questions that fall for determination are of considerable importance affecting the legal profession in general and need to be authoritatively answered by a Constitution bench.
It had thus referred three questions, including whether pre-enrolment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, could be validly prescribed by the BCI and if so whether the decision in Sudeer vs Bar Council of India & Anr requires reconsideration, for consideration by a five-judge bench.
(With inputs from PTI)
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]CUET UG 2023: NTA increases fees, reduces number of questions; know major changes
The NTA has announced major changes in the CUET 2023 exam pattern, registration fees and number of questions to be attempted in the exam. Know changes here. Registration begins at cuet.samarth.ac.in 2023.
Anu Parthiban | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- Eye on autonomy, Scottish Church College plans new courses, curriculum, exam system from 2027: Principal
- FMGE 2026: Protest at Jantar Mantar on Monday; examinees demand exam review, facilities on par with NEET
- ‘We became a bridge’: Volunteers crowdfund to send stranded CJP protesters home after Jantar Mantar stir
- SC raps NCAHP, states for not framing regulations, setting up councils for allied health sciences
- ‘Shouldn’t forget’: An AI engineer’s platform is gathering evidence of police violence at CJP protest
- Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
- NEET Counselling 2026: In NMC’s new rules for PwBD admissions, individualised reports, chance to appeal
- Visva-Bharati professor quits report panel alleging doctored meeting minutes, staff shortage
- Centre sat on a fifth of Samagra Shiksha funds every year; PM SHRI dues at 49% in 2025-26: Govt data
- ‘Greta Thunberg visit not planned’: How SFI UK took the CJP protests to Leeds, London and beyond