Supreme Court upholds powers of BCI to hold All India Bar Examination
Anu Parthiban | February 10, 2023 | 12:28 PM IST | 2 mins read
SC upheld the powers of BCI and said: "The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment".
Get a structured AIBE Question Paper, detailed answer key, and step-by-step explanations for every question.
Download NowNEW DELHI: Five days after the AIBE XVII (17) exam 2023, the Supreme Court today affirmed the powers of the Bar Council of India to hold the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). Candidates who qualify AIBE will be eligible to practice law in courts of the country.
A five-judge bench comprising Justices SK Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, AS Oka, Vikram Nath, and J K Maheshwari was hearing petitions challenging the validity of the AIBE exam.
“These are adequate powers to the Bar Council of India (BCI) under the said act (Advocates Act) to provide for such norms and rules. The effect would be that it is left to the BCI as to what stage the AIBE is to be held - pre or post enrolment,” said the bench headed by Justice SK Kaul.
The court's order came on a petition which examined several issues concerning the AIBE, including at what stage can the examination be prescribed by the BCI under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Also read | AIBE 17 Exam 2023: BCI constitutes fact finding committee to examine misleading, cheating allegations
The bench had reserved its verdict in September last year after hearing arguments in the matter. The apex court in March 2016 had observed that one of the questions that have been raised for determination was whether the BCI is competent to prescribe an examination post-enrolment of an advocate as a condition of eligibility for his continuing to practice at the Bar.
The apex court had said that the questions that fall for determination are of considerable importance affecting the legal profession in general and need to be authoritatively answered by a Constitution bench.
It had thus referred three questions, including whether pre-enrolment training in terms of Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 framed under section 24(3)(d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, could be validly prescribed by the BCI and if so whether the decision in Sudeer vs Bar Council of India & Anr requires reconsideration, for consideration by a five-judge bench.
(With inputs from PTI)
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]CUET UG 2023: NTA increases fees, reduces number of questions; know major changes
The NTA has announced major changes in the CUET 2023 exam pattern, registration fees and number of questions to be attempted in the exam. Know changes here. Registration begins at cuet.samarth.ac.in 2023.
Anu Parthiban | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- Maharashtra eases university teacher recruitment norms; academic weightage cut to 60% from 75%
- UP Budget 2026-27: Vocational education funds up 88%; 14 new medical colleges; school outlay highest
- 3 yrs after UGC guidelines, 80% central universities yet to appoint professors of practice, private ones lead
- NMC approves record 20,098 new MBBS, PG medical seats, 777 after initial rejection
- 2 years into paramedical courses, students find themselves in vocational training; 300 protest in North Bengal
- Vidya Pravesh: 4.2 crore students across 8.9 lakh schools covered, but numbers now falling consistently
- Over 7 lakh Kendriya Vidyalaya students assessed via education ministry’s TARA app, 1.46 lakh on career tool
- Caste on Campus: The shape of discrimination in universities and why many back UGC equity regulations
- Across Telangana’s new government medical colleges, 26 depts empty, 31 with single teachers: Doctors’ survey
- ‘No TET’: School teachers’ jobs at risk, hundreds in Delhi to rally against mandatory eligibility tests