Allahabad HC declines Jauhar university plea; Moradabad court stays demolition of 38 building
Press Trust of India | July 28, 2026 | 05:19 PM IST | 2 mins read
Allahabad high court cites maintainability issue as Moradabad commissioner's court grants interim relief against demolition
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has refused to entertain a petition filed by a businessman on behalf of Mohammad Ali Jauhar University against the demolition of its buildings, observing that the pleader is an outsider and not an official of the institution. As the matter came up before the court, a preliminary objection was raised by the Additional Advocate General (AAG) Anupam Trivedi on the maintainability of the petition.
"This writ petition is being sworn by a person, namely Mohammad Yusuf, who is by occupation a businessman and is being appointed as a pairokar (pleader) of Mohammad Ali Jauhar University ." A university is always represented through its Registrar or any official working there. A stranger cannot approach on behalf of the university, the AAG argued. Following preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition, Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, in his order passed on Monday, refused to hear the matter.
"After going through the records of writ petition, Court finds merit in the objection raised by learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of State," the judge said. The court finds that "in the interest of justice, the present writ petition can be disposed of so that proceedings initiated against the petitioner Trust/University be brought to its logical conclusion," the judge said. Meanwhile, the Moradabad Divisional Commissioner's court had on Monday granted interim relief to the university , founded by Samajawadi Party leader Azam Khan, staying the proposed demolition of 38 buildings on its campus until the final hearing in the case.
Divisional Commissioner Anjaneya Kumar Singh told PTI that the interim stay was granted after the university 's counsel submitted an application. He said the proceedings cannot be held on Tuesday, the scheduled date for hearing, as a condolence meeting has been planned following the death of an advocate in Moradabad. "The application moved by the university's counsel has been accepted and demolition of any structure has been stayed till further orders. The stay will remain in force until the final hearing in the matter," Singh said.
On July 15, the Rampur Development Authority (RDA) directed the university administration to demolish 38 of its 40 buildings within 15 days, alleging that they had been constructed without approved building maps. Students and others have been holding a sit-in protest against the order. The demolition order was issued under Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The deadline expires on July 30.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- ‘Hacker’s bent of mind’: IIT Kanpur, Madras B.Cybersecurity course to train ‘cyber warriors’, says in-charge
- A decade on, Mahatma Gandhi Central University has 5 campuses, none permanent; CAG flags lapses
- Visva-Bharati: SC, ST, OBC forum seeks audit of VBU’s spending, recruitment; writes to education ministry
- MGCU Motihari’s expulsion of MA student unfair; Patna HC orders university to reinstate him
- Maharashtra: MAFSU Nagpur gets first pvt veterinary, dairy technology colleges, doubles BVSc & AH seats
- West Bengal forms panel to decide fate of 933 schools with no students, may hand buildings to other depts
- ‘Not individual failure’: IIT Bombay students protest suicide, want director to quit, action against professor
- West Bengal crackdown on 252 ‘unrecognised’ madrassas leave parents scrambling for alternatives
- NEET PG Counselling: NMC frames branch-specific guidelines for MD, MS admissions of disabled candidates
- IIT Ropar: Faculty ‘harassment’, forced resignation, a self-argued case – how a scholar won her PhD seat back