Candidates Angry Over SSC's new rule. Get Disqualified Despite Good Marks in CHSL
vikrant.shukla | April 11, 2020 | 08:27 PM IST | 1 min read
New Delhi: Many candidates have reported that they have been disqualified for using imaginary names in the answers of the SSC CHSL descriptive exam. Candidates have complained that they scored good marks but have been disqualified in the descriptive exam. This comes after a new rule which was imposed by SSC that forbids candidates from using imaginary names and addresses in their answers. Candidates have complained that this new SSC Unfair Means Rule (UFM) has been imposed incorrectly. Candidates have stormed the social media platform Twitter where a hashtag #SSC_IMAGINARY_UFM has been trending. The concern is related to the SSC CHSL 2018 Descriptive test result.
In the CHSL exam, there is a descriptive paper which comprises essay and letter writing. In letter writing candidates have to use name and address. SSC has said that candidates who use imaginary names and addresses will be disqualified as identity should not be revealed in SSC exams.
Various media reports have stated that the SSC Chairman has assured that the authority will look into the matter although there haven't been any official announcement as such. As per the SSC CHSL exam pattern, the tier 2 is of 100 marks and is descriptive. The result of the descriptive test was declared on February 26, 2020. The tier 2 tests candidates essay and letter writing ability and the minimum marks is 33 percent to qualify tier 2 and be eligible for tier 3 which is a skill and typing test.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Featured News
]- Rice research needs fortification too, say scientists at agriculture universities
- SRCC false caste-bias case: DU college says ‘no such incident’ but video viral amid UGC equity regulations row
- Economic Survey 2026: Upgrade ITI diplomas to degrees to improve jobs, unify apprenticeship schemes
- Economic Survey 2026: Make India ‘education tourism’ hub; offer international students Ayurveda, yoga courses
- Economic Survey 2026 proposes NIRF-like school ranking, PISA-type Class 10 test, more composite schools
- From Rohith to Reform: UGC Equity Regulations 2026, born from tragedies, threaten caste dominance, not merit
- Law School For All: IGNOU is drawing lawyers, cops, CAs, even sitting judges with revamped legal courses
- ‘Autonomy Snatched’: Revised ISI Bill faces opposition in council; academics reject new MoSPI draft
- What are UGC Equity Regulations 2026 and why are they facing ‘general-category’ backlash?
- NITs plan multiple-entry, exit in BTech across institutes, research parks with ADB loan, PhD reform