BPSC 71st CCE 2025: Commission clarifies biometric attendance issues, says eligibility not affected
Vikas Kumar Pandit | September 13, 2025 | 07:54 PM IST | 2 mins read
BPSC 71st CCE Prelims 2025: Some centres reported issues in capturing biometric data. The Commission said candidates’ signatures on duplicate admit cards, sent by exam centres, will serve as valid proof of attendance.
The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has issued a clarification regarding the biometric attendance process in the 71st Combined Competitive Examination (CCE), conducted today, September 13. According to the Commission, some examination centres reported technical issues in recording the biometric attendance of candidates.
Addressing the concerns, BPSC stated that candidates should not be worried in case their biometric data was not captured, as their attendance has already been recorded manually.
The Commission confirmed that invigilators at all centres had taken candidates’ signatures on duplicate admit cards. These signed copies are sent to the Commission through the respective centres and will be treated as valid proof of attendance.
In an official statement, Controller Rajesh Kumar Singh said, “Attendance of all candidates has already been recorded in hard copy, and the signatures taken on the duplicate admit cards are sent to the Commission through the respective centres.”
He further said that the biometric process is an additional security measure to prevent impersonation, and does not affect the eligibility of any candidate if it could not be completed successfully. BPSC emphasised that candidates’ candidature will remain valid irrespective of biometric attendance, provided their physical attendance was marked.
Also read IB ACIO admit card 2025 out for September 16 to 18 exams; tier-1 exam pattern
BPSC 71st CCE 2025: Candidates question sudden change in procedure
This clarification contrasts with BPSC’s earlier notification, which stated: “Biometric and facial recognition of all candidates will be conducted. Candidates will be allowed to leave the examination hall only after completing this process; otherwise, the Commission’s decision to cancel their candidature will be final. For the successful implementation of this process, all candidates should occupy their allotted seats 50 minutes before the start of the examination.”
Candidates expressed concern over social media regarding the change in procedure. “First, it must be said that if there is no biometric, the candidature will be cancelled. What kind of rule do you make that it changes in just 5 minutes?” an X user posted.
Another candidate commented that biometric verification is part of the standard operating procedure to prevent impersonation. The candidate argued that if the process was not implemented properly, it amounted to a failure of the examination system, and a re-exam should be considered.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Eye on autonomy, Scottish Church College plans new courses, curriculum, exam system from 2027: Principal
- FMGE 2026: Protest at Jantar Mantar on Monday; examinees demand exam review, facilities on par with NEET
- ‘We became a bridge’: Volunteers crowdfund to send stranded CJP protesters home after Jantar Mantar stir
- SC raps NCAHP, states for not framing regulations, setting up councils for allied health sciences
- ‘Shouldn’t forget’: An AI engineer’s platform is gathering evidence of police violence at CJP protest
- Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
- NEET Counselling 2026: In NMC’s new rules for PwBD admissions, individualised reports, chance to appeal
- Visva-Bharati professor quits report panel alleging doctored meeting minutes, staff shortage
- Centre sat on a fifth of Samagra Shiksha funds every year; PM SHRI dues at 49% in 2025-26: Govt data
- ‘Greta Thunberg visit not planned’: How SFI UK took the CJP protests to Leeds, London and beyond