DU One-Year PG Programme: Teachers' body claims Delhi University bypassing decision-making process
Press Trust of India | August 2, 2026 | 08:20 AM IST | 2 mins read
Democratic Teachers' Front (DTF) claimed that colleges had received a message from the registrar asking whether they would start a one-year PG programme and send proposals for courses and intake
Know your chances of getting into DTU, NSIT, IGIT etc as per your JEE Rank
Predict NowNEW DELHI: The Democratic Teachers' Front (DTF) on Saturday opposed Delhi University's move to invite colleges to launch the one-year postgraduate programme from the 2026-27 academic session, alleging that the proposal was being pushed through without discussion and adequate infrastructure.
Latest: [Know your admission chances in Delhi's Top engineering Colleges based on your JEE Main Rank] - Predict Now
In a statement, the teachers' body claimed that colleges had received a WhatsApp message from the university registrar asking whether they were willing to start the one-year PG programme and to immediately send proposals indicating courses and intake.
Calling the move "frivolous" and reflective of a "cavalier attitude" towards students, the DTF alleged that the university administration was bypassing established decision-making processes.
"Less than a week has passed since the Academic Council and Executive Council meetings were held... the university administration's move reveals that it no longer considers it necessary to discuss such important moves in the statutory bodies," the statement said.
Also read Across universities, 4th year of NEP’s FYUP more about confusion than research or practical training
Limited seats in one-year PG
According to the DTF, the first batch of students completing the four-year undergraduate programme under the National Education Policy (NEP) framework had already faced challenges due to the implementation of the fourth year and the limited availability of seats in the one-year PG programme.
While the university later increased seats under pressure, it did not proportionately expand infrastructure or teaching resources, the teachers' body claimed.
The DTF further argued that colleges were already grappling with increased student intake under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) quota and the additional burden of the fourth year without corresponding increases in teaching and non-teaching staff.
Also read LSR Delhi University reopens renovated residence hall 4 years after bathroom roof collapse
One-year PG burden on teachers
It alleged that launching the one-year PG programme in colleges would further increase teachers' workload and strain the existing infrastructure, particularly in laboratory-based departments.
It also questioned the timing of the move, noting that admissions to the one-year PG programme had not yet begun while classes for the second year of the existing two-year postgraduate courses were already underway.
The DTF expressed concern over the university's reported plans to amend PhD ordinances to permit direct doctoral admissions after the fourth year of undergraduate study, saying such measures would add to the uncertainty for students.
It said it supported cooperative teaching arrangements between colleges and university departments, but opposed what it described as "ill-designed" measures to implement NEP-driven reforms.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
Opposition MPs argued that the anti paper-leak bill 2026 won’t prevent future leaks. On PM Modi’s handling of CJP protest, Gandhi said, ‘change angle of the heart, not camera’
Shradha Chettri | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- FMGE 2026: Protest at Jantar Mantar on Monday; examinees demand exam review, facilities on par with NEET
- ‘We became a bridge’: Volunteers crowdfund to send stranded CJP protesters home after Jantar Mantar stir
- SC raps NCAHP, states for not framing regulations, setting up councils for allied health sciences
- ‘Shouldn’t forget’: An AI engineer’s platform is gathering evidence of police violence at CJP protest
- Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
- NEET Counselling 2026: In NMC’s new rules for PwBD admissions, individualised reports, chance to appeal
- Visva-Bharati professor quits report panel alleging doctored meeting minutes, staff shortage
- Centre sat on a fifth of Samagra Shiksha funds every year; PM SHRI dues at 49% in 2025-26: Govt data
- ‘Greta Thunberg visit not planned’: How SFI UK took the CJP protests to Leeds, London and beyond
- ‘Treated worse than criminals’: Parents wait for students, teens detained for joining CJP protest to come home