IIM Rohtak fees ‘exorbitant’; institute violates not-for-profit motive: CAG report
R. Radhika | September 23, 2022 | 01:20 PM IST | 2 mins read
IIM Rohtak’s fee receipts amount to 2-3 times the expenditure; over Rs 250 crore has been invested rather than used for expansion or research.
NEW DELHI: The Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Rohtak has been charging “exorbitant fees” from students, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) observed in its audit report of the institute.
IIM Rohtak’s records between 2019 and 2021 were audited by the CAG, where it found that the fee structure of the institute is three-four times higher than the expenditure and continues to increase on a year-on-year basis.
“The fee structure is so designed that the receipts are 2-3 times the expenditure of the institute and too is on an increasing trend year to year. Instead of being invested in growth of institute and utilised on conducting research work, the funds amounting to ₹ 2,51,96,45,000 were deposited in fixed accounts (term deposits) in banks, on which interest amounting to ₹ 17,68,22,281 was earned,” the CAG report stated.
The increasing trend of revenue over expenditure year to year forfeits the “not-for-profit” intent of the institute, the CAG report further stated. In the last three years, IIM Rohtak has earned a surplus of more than 200 percent. In 2020-21, IIM Rohtak spent only Rs 2,691 lakh but earned Rs 7,826 lakh.
Also Read | IIM Rohtak declines fee refund requests, students lose lakhs in IPM, IPL admission
IIM Rohtak: CAG report on fees
The report, accessed by Careers360 says that “according to Section 10 (23C) (iiiab) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, any income received by a person on behalf of any university or any educational institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit, and which is wholly or substantially financed by the government, is entitled to exemption.”
IIM Rohtak receipt, expenditure audit
|
|
Receipts (In Rs lakh) |
Expenditure (In Rs lakh) |
Surplus (In Rs lakh) |
Percentage of surplus to expenditure |
|
2018-19 |
5,463.61 |
2,395.90 |
3,067.71 |
228.04 % |
|
2019-20 |
7,613.14 |
2,873.75 |
4,739.39 |
264.92% |
|
2020-21 |
7,826.15 |
2,691.33 |
5,134.83 |
290.79 % |
Careers360 sent a detailed questionnaire to IIM Rohtak to which the institute has not yet responded. The official spokesperson said that the institute has recently submitted responses to the “draft CAG report” and the final report is yet to come.
In response to the audit, as per the CAG report, the institute replied that IIM Rohtak’s fee structure has been decided with the approval of the apex body of the institute and in line with the fee charged by similar institutes of national importance. “The annual fee is dependent on several factors including annual student intake, yearly institute expenditure, future expansion plans, fee of peer institutes etc. and many others,” IIM Rohtak told the CAG.
Also Read | CAT 2022 Preparation: 60-day study plan to crack MBA entrance exam; syllabus, important topics
However, the CAG rejected this response and said the institute violated the “not-for-profit motive” of the institute as stated in the IIM Act 2017.
“The exorbitant charging of fee results into deprivation of the low income group students from reach of education who, at the time of applying for admission, are apprehensive of affording the payment of the fee on too much higher side, thereby resulting into constricting, circumventing and denial of the equality of opportunity for education and employment,” the report said.
According to the audit report, grants from the government to IIM Rohtak have been below the 50 percent threshold every year from the 2015-16 to the 2018-19 academic session.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]NMC ‘relaxing norms’ for new medical colleges will raise MBBS fees, dilute quality: Experts
NMC proposes removing clause requiring a university to run a functioning hospital for 2 years before setting up a medical college, launching MBBS course. Here’s why experts, doctors think it’s a bad idea.
Sanjay | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- IIIT Allahabad fines B.Techs who accept campus placement offers and then take other jobs, allege students
- Tamil Nadu: Chennai LKG fees highest in state; fee details of thousands of TN private schools public
- GMR Aero Technic’s aviation course produces professionals airlines can deploy from day one: President
- No more ‘half-baked doctors’: NMC scraps 2-year PG medical diplomas; over 3,300 seats will go to MD, MS
- MBBS interns seek uniform stipend policy as amounts vary wildly and private medical colleges underpay
- NEET UG 2026 Re-Exam: 20 Goa candidates denied extra 15 minutes at centre, demand inquiry
- ‘Not fashion design’: JK Lakshmipat University focuses on design as tool to solve problems, says director
- Three years on, BUHS has left 2 lakh paramedical students with no exams or results and a bleak future
- NEET Exam: Why more women qualify, top the lists, but still can't make it to AIIMS
- Anna University students piece together BTech courses as faculty gaps lead to fragmented teaching