KV Class 1 Admission 2022: Delhi HC refuses to interfere with six years age criteria
Press Trust of India | April 13, 2022 | 06:03 PM IST | 3 mins read
The court said the appellant can apply to KV Class 1 admission next year, this year, or seek admission in other schools which are yet to implement NEP.
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to interfere with Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS)'s decision fixing six years as the minimum age for applying for admission to class 1 in Kendriya Vidyalayas for the upcoming academic session. A bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi dismissed an appeal by a five-year-old UKG student, against the single judge order rejecting her challenge to the change in the minimum age criteria which was earlier five years, and noted that the decision was in compliance with the National Education Policy, 2020 (NEP).
Also read | KVS Admission 2022: Registration deadline for KV Class 1 admission extended till April 13
The bench, also comprising Justice Navin Chawla, said that it did not find merit in the appellant's submission that the age change was sudden and prejudicial. “If the child is five and it is increased to six, what is sudden about it? You will get the chance next year,” the court observed.
The court said that the appellant would be entitled to apply to KV for class 1 admission next year and this year, it is open to her to seek admission in other schools which are yet to implement NEP.
“The submission of appellant was, and even before us is, the implementation is being done in a sudden manner to the prejudice of the appellant. We do not find any merit in this submission. There is nothing sudden about the implementation of the policy since there would always be a fixed date when the policy would be implemented,” the bench said.
Also read | Bihar Board 12th admit card 2022 released for compartment cum special practical exam
“In any event, the implementation of the policy would not cause any prejudice to the appellant as she is not being denied the chance to secure admission in class 1. The only difference is that she would be entitled to seek admission in class 1 in a KVS only next year. If the appellant is desirous of admission in class 1, it is open to her to seek admission in other schools which have not implemented the NEP till date,” it added.
The court also noted that the policy itself, which prescribed six years as the minimum age for admission to class 1 was not under challenge, and the appellant's stand that other schools have also not implemented the policy cannot be accepted for the reason that “non-compliance of centre's direction for the implementation of NEP by other schools cannot be a reason to restrain KVS from doing so”.
“We find no reason to interfere with the same (the appeal). Dismissed,” the court said. On April 11, Justice Rekha Palli dismissed a batch of petitions with the minimum age criteria of six years as of March 31, 2022, for admission to class 1 in Kendriya Vidyalaya for the upcoming academic session.
Also read | 'ABVP made false claims': JNU hostel committee asks university to withdraw statement, meet victims
The Centre had defended the decision of the KVS and argued that there was no "vested right" in the petitioners to seek admission in KV and any adverse order from the court would have a pan-India impact. In her petition, the appellant had said that the change in age is arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, unreasonable, and without the authority of law and that it did not give sufficient time to the parents to make alternate arrangements.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- From Rohith to Reform: UGC Equity Regulations 2026, born from tragedies, threaten caste dominance, not merit
- Law School For All: IGNOU is drawing lawyers, cops, CAs, even sitting judges with revamped legal courses
- ‘Autonomy Snatched’: Revised ISI Bill faces opposition in council; academics reject new MoSPI draft
- What are UGC Equity Regulations 2026 and why are they facing ‘general-category’ backlash?
- NITs plan multiple-entry, exit in BTech across institutes, research parks with ADB loan, PhD reform
- Environmental Law: NLU Odisha, Assam, Northeast law schools are making tribal rights core of curriculum
- ‘Generative AI knowledge limited to ChatGPT’: Why law schools are launching artificial intelligence centres
- LLB, LLM courses in English but for lawyers in lower courts, regional language command key to win cases
- Part-time law PhD enrolment on the rise as lawyers, aspiring academics embrace flexible courses
- Student Suicides: ‘Need accountability, not new law; it’s about well-being, not mental health,’ says NTF chief