Maharashtra: Court rejects bail plea of educational institute's top official in rape case
Press Trust of India | March 9, 2025 | 12:03 PM IST | 2 mins read
The accused Rameshchandra Shobnath Mishra, allegedly demanded Rs 7 lakh to get the victim's employment, promising an eventual salary of Rs 70,000 to Rs 80,000 per month.
THANE: A Thane court has rejected the bail application of the chairman of an educational institute here who is accused of raping and sexually harassing a woman, noting there is substantial material on record and the probe into the case it at the initial stage.
Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, Suryakant S Shinde rejected the bail application of the accused in the order passed on March 4. A copy of the order was made available on Saturday. The accused, Rameshchandra Shobnath Mishra, was arrested on January 30 this year.
According to the victim's complaint, she met the accused in 2013 through her sister-in-law while seeking a teaching job. The accused, who is the chairman of the educational institute in Maharashtra's Thane city, allegedly demanded Rs 7 lakh to get her employment, promising an eventual salary of Rs 70,000 to Rs 80,000 per month.
The victim managed to pay Rs 6 lakh, and in 2015, the accused further demanded Rs 10 lakh, allegedly in exchange of confirming her position in the job. When the victim refused to pay, the accused allegedly coerced her into a sexual relationship, threatening her with dire consequences if she disclosed about it to anyone.
The victim claimed the accused sexually exploited her multiple times under the pretext of getting her a job. The defence counsel argued that the victim was not qualified for a junior college job approval as she lacked a postgraduate degree and alleged the case was a result of personal grudges.
Multiple women accuses Mishra with similar allegations
While requesting for bail, the counsel also cited the accused's health condition, saying he was a diabetes patient undergoing treatment. Additional Public Prosecutor Sanjay More, however, argued that multiple women have made similar allegations against the accused, and further inquiry is needed.
Judge Shinde said, "Considering the allegations made in the complaint, at this stage there is substantial material on record. The investigation in the matter is at the initial stage."
The prima facie case is made out under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 64(2)(m) (repeated rape on same woman), 68 (sexual intercourse by a person in authority), 69 (sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means, etc), 75 (sexual harassment), 79 (word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty of a woman), 351(2) (criminal conspiracy) and 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), the court said.
"Considering the nature of the offence and that the investigation in the matter is in progress, at this stage, it is not a fit case to release the applicant/accused on bail," the judge said.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- FMGE 2026: Protest at Jantar Mantar on Monday; examinees demand exam review, facilities on par with NEET
- ‘We became a bridge’: Volunteers crowdfund to send stranded CJP protesters home after Jantar Mantar stir
- SC raps NCAHP, states for not framing regulations, setting up councils for allied health sciences
- ‘Shouldn’t forget’: An AI engineer’s platform is gathering evidence of police violence at CJP protest
- Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
- NEET Counselling 2026: In NMC’s new rules for PwBD admissions, individualised reports, chance to appeal
- Visva-Bharati professor quits report panel alleging doctored meeting minutes, staff shortage
- Centre sat on a fifth of Samagra Shiksha funds every year; PM SHRI dues at 49% in 2025-26: Govt data
- ‘Greta Thunberg visit not planned’: How SFI UK took the CJP protests to Leeds, London and beyond
- ‘Treated worse than criminals’: Parents wait for students, teens detained for joining CJP protest to come home