NMC tightens medical advertising norms; bans AI-generated testimonials, unverified claims
Press Trust of India | October 8, 2026 | 01:15 PM IST | 3 mins read
NMC norms also restrict doctors from using unverifed claims such as 'best' or '100 percent success'.
The National Medical Commission has barred doctors and hospitals from using artificial intelligence to create or circulate fabricated patient experiences, clinical outcomes and endorsements as part of new ethical guidelines aimed at curbing misleading promotion of medical services. Under the guidelines issued by the Commission, doctors also cannot describe themselves or their services using claims such as "best", "number one" "most trusted" "guaranteed cures" or "100% success" unless such claims are verifiable.
The new norms, which were issued by the National Medical Commission (NMC) on Wednesday and have come into effect immediately, come with a graded system of disciplinary action for violations. For a first violation, the guidelines prescribe a warning and mandatory ethics training. A second violation can attract censure and a monetary penalty, while a third violation can lead to suspension for three to six months. Serious violations can attract suspension for six to 12 months, while repeated violations can result in removal from the medical register for one to three years.
Prohibition under guidelines
The guidelines prohibit registered medical practitioners and hospitals from using AI-generated content for advertising their services, soliciting patients or disseminating unverifiable information relating to diagnoses, treatments and outcomes. The NMC has specifically said, "AI cannot be used to create synthetic patient testimonials, voices, clinical outcomes or fake endorsements" or to misrepresent the nature or quality of medical services.
The guidelines also prohibit doctors from using AI-generated material that could make a medical service appear more effective or successful than it actually is or placing the authenticity of information available to patients at the centre of its advertising norms. Another major provision bars doctors from paying to manipulate their rankings on search engines and apps, while also restricting unverified claims about the quality or success of medical services.
The Commission has also sought to regulate the growing role of third parties in patient acquisition. Doctors and hospitals cannot offer limited-period discounts, coupons, gift packages or referral benefits, which are likely to encourage unnecessary consultations. The guidelines also place restrictions on the use of patient photographs, requiring valid consent and appropriate safeguards. Patient testimonials, beforehand after photographs and treatment-success claims that could create unrealistic expectations or mislead patients have also been prohibited. The NMC, however, has allowed doctors to use social media for factual, non-promotional health education, while hospitals can share objective details about their services.
The distinction is significant as the guidelines do not prohibit doctors and hospitals from communicating health information online but seek to prevent such communication from becoming promotional or misleading. The provisions also seek to prevent promotional practices that could influence patients through financial incentives, exaggerated claims or fabricated evidence of treatment success. By explicitly covering AI-generated testimonials, voices and clinical outcomes, the guidelines extend ethical advertising requirements to newer forms of digital content that can make artificially created material appear authentic.
The NMC has also restricted claims and promotional material that could give patients unrealistic expectations about the likely results of a treatment. The guidelines cover a wide range of advertising and patient-procurement practices, including AI-generated content, search-engine rankings, influencer arrangements, discounts and referral benefits, besides conventional patient testimonials and treatment-success claims. The Commission has emphasised that doctors and hospitals can continue to provide objective information and health education, but such communication should not mislead patients or promote medical services through unverifiable claims.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Karnataka coaching centres may face 5-hour daily cap, no under-15 enrolment, Rs 5 lakh fine for violations
- Why was Anbil Mahesh arrested? Tamil Nadu’s Rs 400-crore private school approvals case explained
- After AMU and Jamia, BHU students launch agitation for union polls, on hold for 3 decades
- MUHS Nashik plans 865 new colleges: 51 for MBBS, most in small towns; big push for allied health sciences
- NSO Survey: Nearly 50% of children travelling at least 1 km to school walk, more so in rural areas
- At 7 IITs, 1,495 reserved SC, ST, OBC faculty posts vacant; IIT Kharagpur alone has 710, reveals RTI data
- In a first for NEET UG Counselling, costliest medical colleges slash MBBS fees up to 40% as seats go vacant
- ISRO communication and media scholar India’s sole representative from field in world top 2% scientists list
- Boomerang effect? Jadavpur bookstalls report fourfold rise in sales after Durga Puja attack sparks resistance
- Maharashtra NEET UG Counselling: HC refuses to let medical college hold own MBBS rounds, says plea ‘premature’