Follow DU admission policy to non-minority seats, no interview: HC directs St Stephen's College
Press Trust of India | September 12, 2022 | 01:43 PM IST | 2 mins read
Delhi HC's order came on petitions by St Stephen's College with respect to the legality of admission of students against unreserved non-minority seats.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Monday directed St Stephen's College to follow the admission policy formulated by Delhi University (DU) and accord 100 per cent weightage to the CUET 2022 score while granting admission to non-minority students in its undergraduate courses.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, however, held that DU "cannot insist upon a single merit list for admission of candidates belonging to Christian community regardless of denomination etc.” The bench, also comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad, said the fundamental right under Article 30(1) of the Constitution accorded to a minority institution cannot be accorded to non-minority admissions.
“Aided minority institutions must follow the norms and procedure of the said university. Protection under Article 30 (1) can be extended to the extent that it allows minority institutions to sub-classify the reservation accorded to minority community,” the court said.
Also read | DU CSAS admission portal 2022 active now; Delhi University's admission process explained
The court's order came on petitions by a law student and St Stephen's College with respect to the legality of admission procedure for admission of students against unreserved non-minority seats for UG courses.
“Consequently the communication … issued by respondent no 1 (DU) is liable to be set aside to the extent that the petitioner college (St Stephen's) shall follow the directive that 100 per cent weightage must be given to CUET 2022 score for students of the non-minority category applying to UG courses. However, respondent 1 cannot insist upon single merit list for admission of candidates belonging to Christian community regardless of denomination, subsets etc),” the court ordered.
“The petitioner is, therefore, directed to follow the admission policy 2022 -2023 as formulated by respondent 1 to this extent. The petitioner college must withdraw its admission prospectus and issue of public notice,” it ordered.
Law student Konika Poddar, in her public interest litigation, had sought a direction to the college to take admission on its 'unreserved seats' only based on marks received by students in the Common University Entrance Test (CUET).
St Stephen's College had challenged Delhi University (DU)'s letter asking it to withdraw its prospectus which gave 85 per cent weightage to CUET and 15 per cent weightage to college interview for admission to its unreserved seats in UG courses. The high court had earlier refused to stay for now the university's letter on withdrawal of the college prospectus for the academic year 2022-23.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- NMC drafts rules to sideline states on medical college approvals, gets tougher on infrastructure norms
- From IIT Madras to Kharagpur: Why top engineering colleges are now teaching biomedical sciences
- VBSA Bill: Joint Parliamentary Committee to finalise, adopt draft report on July 17
- NCAHP push for uniform allied healthcare education slowed by missing state councils, implementation gaps
- Maharashtra hostels for SC, ST students run without wardens, overcrowded; some ‘bogus’: CAG report
- 'Diagnosed with SLD by accident’: Adults fighting ADHD, dyslexia, dyscalculia have neither measure nor relief
- Over 70% Indians in Germany find right job, fit into workforce, but language a major hurdle: Study
- AISHE Report: SC, ST faculty at just 10% and 3%, women drop from 44% at entry level to 27% at professor rank
- Has DST scrapped INSPIRE-SHE scholarship? No notice, list, or clarity leaves students wondering
- In National Pharmacy Commission Bill, exit test after B.Pharm, board for AYUSH and reduced state role