SC directs Lakshadweep admin to include meat products in midday meals for school children
The petitioner challenged the decision to remove chicken and other meat items from the menu of midday meals for school children in Lakshadweep.
Press Trust of India | May 3, 2022 | 08:06 AM IST
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed continuation of the Kerala high court order directing the Lakshadweep administration to include meat products, including chicken, in the menu of midday meals for school children. The top court was hearing a plea challenging the decision of the Lakshadweep administration to close dairy farms and remove meat products, including chicken, from the menu of midday meals for school children.
Also read | UP official asked to serve mid-day meals as 'symbolic punishment' for delay in responding to RTI
A bench of Justices Indira Banerjee and A S Bopanna issued notice to the Union of India, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, and others on an appeal filed against the order of the Kerala High Court which had dismissed a PIL challenging the decision of the Lakshadweep administration.
“Issue notice, returnable in two weeks after the ensuing summer vacation. “In the meanwhile, the interim order passed by the High Court on June 22, 2021 shall continue,” the bench said. The high court had on June 22, 2021 stayed the operation of two orders of the Lakshadweep administration -- to close down dairy farms and remove meat products, including chicken, from the menu of midday meals for school children.
The division bench of the high court had in September 2021 dismissed the PIL filed by Kavaratti-native Ajmal Ahmed, who alleged that when Praful Khoda Patel took charge as island administrator in December last year, his top priority was to close down the farms run by the animal husbandry department and to "attack" the food habits of the islanders being followed from time immemorial.
Also read | Over 8 lakh students in J-K benefit under Centre's mid-day meal scheme: Govt
Challenging the May 21, 2021 order of the Director of Animal Husbandry, directing immediate closure of all dairy farms, Ahmed said it was done with an intention to implement the proposed Animal Preservation (Regulation), 2021, which bans the slaughter of cows, calves and bulls.
He had submitted that as per this proposed rule, the sale and purchase of beef and beef products would be banned by closing down the farms, curtailing the islanders' source of getting milk products, and forcing them to purchase milk products imported from Gujarat.
The petitioner had also challenged the administration's decision to remove chicken and other meat items from the menu of midday meals for school children in Lakshadweep.
"As per the decision taken by the said committee in the meeting held on January 27, 2021, a new menu has been suggested, totally altering the prevailing menu for mid-day meal for the students in the Islands," he had alleged.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Study Abroad: New Zealand revises post-study work visa rules for international postgraduate students
- Maharashtra Election 2024: State’s job scheme stumbles; just 21% apprentice placements in private firms
- ‘First-of-its-kind’: IIT Madras, IIM Udaipur, IIIT Nagpur hostels to be built in PPP-mode
- IIM Calcutta, Delhi, XLRI: How management schools are planning new ways to improve NIRF ranking in research
- Study Abroad: India beats China in race for US education, leads with 3.31 lakh students, says report
- Delhi University students, teachers demand removal of principal accused of slapping Dalit student
- These MBA specialisations are seeing a surge in demand, jobs
- Education News This Week: Fake news on CBSE exams; UPPSC protests, crackdown on coaching ads
- CAT 2024 and a day on campus: How Nirma University plans MBA admissions
- NEET PG Counselling: Telangana’s domicile rules leave hundreds with ‘nowhere to go’; over 70 move court