Why did you not ban ‘tilak’?: Supreme Court stays hijab ban imposed by Mumbai private college
Anu Parthiban | August 9, 2024 | 03:16 PM IST | 2 mins read
The Supreme Court has issued a notice and sought a response from NG Acharya and DK Marathe College by November 18.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today in an interim order stayed a Mumbai college circular banning ‘hijab, burqa, cap and naqab' on the campus and said educational institutions cannot force on them their choice. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar issued notice to the Chembur Trombay Education Society, which runs the ‘NG Acharya and DK Marathe College', and sought its response by November 18.
"Girl students must have freedom of choice in what they are wearing and college cannot force them...It's unfortunate that you suddenly wake up to know that there are many religions in the country," the bench told the college administration at the centre of a fresh row over a dress code for Muslim students.
Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan for the petitioners said that the college has been functioning since 2008 and submitted that 441 Muslim students are "happily attending" the college and the objection was raised only by a few Muslim students, the Live Law reported.
"Don't impose such a rule..what is this? Don't reveal religion?" "Will their names not reveal religion? Will you ask them to be identified by numbers?"Justice Sanjiv Khanna asked, referring to the rule imposed by the college.
He further asked why the college administration did not ban ‘tilak’ or ‘bindi’ if it proposed the religion should not be revealed.
The court, however, said no burqa can be allowed to be worn by girls inside the classroom and no religious activities can be permitted on the campus.
The top court which was hearing a plea challenging a Bombay High Court verdict upholding the college's decision to ban hijab, burqa and naqab inside the campus said that the interim order “should not be misused by anybody and granted liberty to the educational society and the college to approach the court in case of any misuse”, the PTI reported.
Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves and advocate Abiha Zaidi, appearing for the petitioners, including Zainab Abdul Qayyum, submitted that students were not able to attend classes because of the ban, it added.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- ‘At Regulatory Crossroads’: Psychology courses caught in UGC, NCAHP, RCI tangle, causing confusion
- NMC drafts rules to sideline states on medical college approvals, gets tougher on infrastructure norms
- SRM Medical College bets on AI, interdisciplinary learning to make students tech-savvy, research-driven: Dean
- From IIT Madras to Kharagpur: Why top engineering colleges are now teaching biomedical sciences
- VBSA Bill: Joint Parliamentary Committee to finalise, adopt draft report on July 17
- NCAHP push for uniform allied healthcare education slowed by missing state councils, implementation gaps
- Maharashtra hostels for SC, ST students run without wardens, overcrowded; some ‘bogus’: CAG report
- 'Diagnosed with SLD by accident’: Adults fighting ADHD, dyslexia, dyscalculia have neither measure nor relief
- Over 70% Indians in Germany find right job, fit into workforce, but language a major hurdle: Study
- AISHE Report: SC, ST faculty at just 10% and 3%, women drop from 44% at entry level to 27% at professor rank