Centre will not act on Madras HC’s remarks on NEET
Pritha Roy Choudhury | March 13, 2020 | 04:47 PM IST | 2 mins read
NEW DELHI: The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare is not planning to take action on the Madras High Court’s remark that the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) favours the urban and wealthy candidates who can afford coaching.
In the ministry’s view, “the matter has already been settled” by the Supreme Court and the Parliament, it told Lok Sabha in response to a question on March 13.
NEET Impersonation
The NEET was made the single exam for admission into all medical colleges across the country on the order of the Supreme Court. It covered all states first in 2017. Two years later, in 2019, widespread corruption and impersonation were discovered in the examination and counselling process in some states. The cases reached the Madras High Court which, on the basis of data shared by the state of Tamil Nadu, had made two broad observations in November 2019.
According to the government’s own reply, the Madras HC had noted that “the number of candidates who appeared multiple times got admission more than who appeared the first time and also only negligible candidates got admission without undergoing coaching”.
However, the Madras HC’s observations were on equity and access. The Firstpost reported that the court said: “That means medical education is not available to the poor people and it is available only to those who underwent coaching classes by spending lakhs of rupees. Moreover, this will also put rural students in a disadvantageous position, as they lack facilities of undergoing coaching." These are the comments referred to in the Parliament question.
The Response
However, the Central Government does not intend to address the issues raised by the Madras High Court. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has referred to a number of laws and Supreme Court judgments to explain why, in its view, no action is required to improve access to rural students.
Tamil Nadu had attempted to block the implementation of NEET in the state by passing two Bills to that effect in the state legislatures but was ultimately thwarted by the Centre. As the response says: “The provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 for conducting NEET shall apply across the country without any exemption.”
The reply also reminds that the National Medical Commission Act 2019 now provides for NEET – Tamil Nadu had objected to that as well – and that the exam was originally made mandatory by the Supreme Court. In 2016, the SC had ruled that “only NEET would enable students to get admission to MBBS or BDS studies”.
Also read :
-
NEET Scam: Experts suggest better use of technology, further centralization of exam’s management
-
AIIMS and JIPMER to admit students based on NEET scores from 2020
Write to us at news@careers360.com
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Featured News
]- SRCC false caste-bias case: DU college says ‘no such incident’ but video viral amid UGC equity regulations row
- Economic Survey 2026: Upgrade ITI diplomas to degrees to improve jobs, unify apprenticeship schemes
- Economic Survey 2026: Make India ‘education tourism’ hub; offer international students Ayurveda, yoga courses
- Economic Survey 2026 proposes NIRF-like school ranking, PISA-type Class 10 test, more composite schools
- From Rohith to Reform: UGC Equity Regulations 2026, born from tragedies, threaten caste dominance, not merit
- Law School For All: IGNOU is drawing lawyers, cops, CAs, even sitting judges with revamped legal courses
- ‘Autonomy Snatched’: Revised ISI Bill faces opposition in council; academics reject new MoSPI draft
- What are UGC Equity Regulations 2026 and why are they facing ‘general-category’ backlash?
- NITs plan multiple-entry, exit in BTech across institutes, research parks with ADB loan, PhD reform
- Environmental Law: NLU Odisha, Assam, Northeast law schools are making tribal rights core of curriculum