HC seeks Edu ministry’s reply on plea for contempt for not extending RTE beyond 14 years age
Justice Najmi Waziri questioned the Central government as to why decision has not been taken to extend RTE Act beyond 8th class and upto 12th class, despite court’s directions passed in 2019
Press Trust of India | March 3, 2021 | 02:42 PM IST
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court Wednesday sought response of Ministry of Education on a plea seeking contempt action against the authorities for not taking decision on extension of free education under the Right To Education (RTE) Act to children of EWS even after attaining 14 years of age in the same school.
Justice Najmi Waziri questioned the Central government as to why decision has not been taken to extend RTE Act beyond 8th class and upto 12th class, despite court’s directions passed in 2019. The court issued notice to Secretary of Ministry of Education seeking reply on the contempt petition filed by NGO Social Jurist and listed the matter for further hearing on March 17.
Advocates Ashok Agarwal and Kumar Utkarsh, representing the NGO, said due to inaction on the part of the Central government, private schools across the country are throwing thousand of Economically Weaker Section (EWS) students out of school every year after they pass class 8th. “The very objective and purpose of fundamental right to education is defeated if any EWS student is not allowed to continue his studies in private school beyond class 8th and upto class 12,” the counsel said.
In December 2019, the high court had asked the Centre to take a decision on the extension of free education to disadvantaged children even after attaining the age of 14 years or beyond. The plea sought initiation of contempt proceedings against the authorities for their alleged deliberate and intentional disobedience of December 9, 2019 judgement of the high court.
The plea alleged that that a period of more than a year has since elapsed and authorities have not taken any decision in this matter till date and that the parents of EWS category students are not in financial position to pay hefty school fee to unaided private schools in classes 9th and onwards. It submitted that if a student has studied from nursery to class 8th in an english medium unaided private school and is asked to go to government school in class 9th and onwards, great prejudice would be caused to such student for more than one reasons.
It added that over one lakh students who would pass class 8th in the academic year 2020-21 will be thrown out of schools on account of financial inability on the part of parents to pay school fee in class 9th and onwards.
Write to us at news@careers360.com .
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Explainer: What is an APAAR ID, how does it work and is it compulsory?
- Maharashtra NEET UG Counselling: HC asks medical college to admit student denied MBBS seat in fee row
- PARAKH Rashtriya Sarvekshan 2024 first assessment as per NEP, says CEO; test tomorrow
- 36% AIIMS faculty positions vacant across 20 functioning medical colleges
- JEE Advanced 2025: Students dropped out of BTech, joined coaching for third attempt
- ‘Those who join ISRO are driven by passion’: Chairman S Somanath
- CLAT 2025: Domicile quotas in NLU admissions spark diversity, merit debate
- DU Law Faculty stays with CLAT 2025 for 5-year LLB admissions but plans separate exam for the future
- New UGC policy will help students speed up or slow down undergraduate degree programmes; here’s how
- Over 15,000 professors of practice in universities; just 80 in IITs: Education ministry