JoSAA 2024: Category-wise top 20 percentile cut-off marks out of 500 out; details here
Alivia Mukherjee | June 10, 2024 | 09:21 AM IST | 1 min read
JoSAA 2024 counseling registration and choice-filling process will begin today, June 10.
NEW DELHI: The Joint Seat Allocation Authority (JoSAA) will commence the JoSAA 2024 registration process and choice-filling today, June 10. The JoSAA has announced the category-wise, top 20 percentile cut-off marks out of the total 500 marks for 2023 and 2024.
JoSAA counseling facilitates admission to the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), National Institutes of Technology (NITs), and other engineering colleges. About 15 lakh JEE-2024(Main) candidates are eligible to participate for about 42,000 seats for the NIT+ System. This year, there will be a total of five rounds of seat allocation conducted by JoSAA.
JoSAA 2024: Top 20 percentile criteria
The JoSAA top 20 percentile criterion is utilized to assess the eligibility of candidates for admission to the IITs and NIT+ system. According to this criterion, candidates must either score within the top 20 percentile of their respective boards or qualify the JEE Advanced examination to be considered eligible for admission.
IIT Admission 2024 Eligibility: 75% aggregate marks criteria
Candidates are required to have completed their Class 12 (or equivalent) board examination with a minimum of five subjects, obtaining an aggregate score of at least 75%. For candidates belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Person with Disabilities (PwD) categories, the minimum aggregate marks required are 65%
JoSAA 2024: Category-wise top 20 percentile cut-off marks out of 500
The specific minimum marks required to achieve the top 20 percentile may vary from board to board. Candidates can have a look at the top 20 percentile category-wise cut-off marks out of 500 for some of the boards below.
CBSE
|
Year |
Category |
|||
|
|
General |
OBC-NCL |
SC |
ST |
|
2023 |
420 |
412 |
382 |
372 |
|
2024 |
417 |
414 |
391 |
372 |
Indian School Certificate (ISC)
|
Year |
Category |
|||
|
|
General |
OBC |
SC |
ST |
|
2023 |
444 |
432 |
418 |
378 |
|
2024 |
444 |
431 |
415 |
375 |
Board of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh
|
Year |
Category |
|||
|
|
General (Total marks 1000) |
OBC (Total marks 1000) |
SC (Total marks 1000) |
ST (Total marks 1000) |
|
2023 |
942 |
916 |
874 |
862 |
|
2024 |
940 |
916 |
875 |
849 |
Jharkhand Academic Council
|
Year |
Category |
|||
|
|
General |
OBC |
SC |
ST |
|
2023 |
384 |
381 |
373 |
372 |
|
2024 |
366 |
374 |
354 |
349 |
Board of School Education Uttarakhand
|
Year |
Category |
|||
|
|
General Percentage (Marks) |
OBC Percentage (Marks) |
SC Percentage (Marks) |
ST Percentage (Marks) |
|
2023 |
73.60 (368) |
70.40(352) |
68.00(343) |
70.00 (350) |
|
2024 |
(76.60) 383 |
72.60 (363) |
71.40 (357) |
74.00 (370) |
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Study in India falls short on visa issues, curricula; NITI Aayog sets 5 lakh foreign students target for 2047
- JEE Advanced reports show IITs cut hundreds of BTech seats in core engineering; here’s what happened
- Exam déjà vu? AMU law faculty reuses last year’s BA LLB Hons question paper; students oppose retest
- Pre, Post-Matric Scholarships for minorities disbursed to thousands of ineligible or fake beneficiaries: CAG
- PMKVY: CAG flags missing names from Skill India scheme, 34 lakh losing payout due to poor NSDC oversight
- ‘IIM Ahmedabad Dubai is the brand ambassador of Indian education system in UAE’: Dean of new campus
- TISS Mumbai: More students seek help for relationship woes than studies; women prefer text, show helpline data
- Education budget utilisation has improved since Covid pandemic: Government data
- DU axe on Indian languages in BA Programme over empty seats; teachers blame CUET, vacancies
- Allahabad University, central institutes ‘bypass’ SC, ST hiring with ‘not found suitable’ excuse: Panel