SC directs IIT-Madras to treat OCI students at par with Indian students concerning fees
Press Trust of India | February 8, 2022 | 07:39 PM IST | 2 mins read
IIT Madras: The OCI card provides long-term visa-free travel and gives card-holders a host of privileges normally not given to a foreign national.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Tuesday directed the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras to treat an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) student at par with Indian students concerning the fee charged. A bench comprising Justices Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari referred to its interim order dated October 27, 2021, which allowed an OCI NEET PG aspirant to appear in the counselling in the general category at par with Indian citizens, while granting him relief.
"Having heard counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the respondent-IIT, Madras has to consider the applicant/petitioner at par with the Indian citizens with regard to the fee charged in terms of our order dated October 27, 2021, subject to the result of this petition. The application is accordingly disposed of," the bench said.
Also read | Karnataka Hijab Row: High Court to resume hearing plea seeking permission to wear hijab tomorrow
Senior advocate, Anitha Shenoy, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the institute is asking them to pay as per the fee structure set out for foreign nationals. She contended that for the past 12 years, OCI students have been paying the same fee as their Indian counterparts which have been reversed in 2021 without any notice.
The counsel for the petitioner had earlier submitted that IIT Madras was asking the student to pay the same fees as charged from foreign nationals and referred to the order passed by the apex court allowing OCI candidates to attend NEET counselling in the general category at par with residents here.
The plea had contended that treating OCIs on par with Non-Resident Indians and foreign nationals was arbitrary. Highly popular among overseas Indians, the OCI card provides long-term visa-free travel and stay in India and gives the card-holders a host of privileges normally not given to a foreign national.
Also read | IIT Madras launches water management, policy centre to solve water issues in India
On a separate application, the bench also clarified that OCI students are also permitted to be treated at par with Indian students and are allowed to apply to any course/courses including Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) for the academic year 2021-2022.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]DU Reopen: Student tries to set himself ablaze during protest to demand resumption of offline classes
Delhi University Reopen News: The student did not suffer any injuries, they said, adding that he was immediately rescued by the police and taken to the hospital, said the Delhi Police
Press Trust of India | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- 2025 for Education: VBSA Bill, CBSE board exams, NAAC accreditation scam – big policies, bigger controversies
- PU Chandigarh: Stalled promotions, ‘discriminatory’ rules push college teachers to renew parity demand
- ‘Last democratic step’: Why 200 OUAT Bhubaneswar research scholars are on hunger strike
- MBBS Abroad: Indian students in Bangladesh medical colleges safe, but fresh violence keeps them on edge
- Post-Al Falah, Haryana expands control, can shut private universities over national security concerns
- Study in India falls short on visa issues, curricula; NITI Aayog sets 5 lakh foreign students target for 2047
- JEE Advanced reports show IITs cut hundreds of BTech seats in core engineering; here’s what happened
- Exam déjà vu? AMU law faculty reuses last year’s BA LLB Hons question paper; students oppose retest
- Pre, Post-Matric Scholarships for minorities disbursed to thousands of ineligible or fake beneficiaries: CAG
- PMKVY: CAG flags missing names from Skill India scheme, 34 lakh losing payout due to poor NSDC oversight