Tamil Nadu files review petition against SC TET order affecting serving teachers
Vikas Kumar Pandit | September 30, 2025 | 02:09 PM IST | 2 mins read
The state says retrospective enforcement of the TET rule could impact over 3 lakh teachers with years of service left. Pre-2010 appointees may lose promotion eligibility, creating shortages that could disrupt education for rural and marginalised children.
Know all about the analysis and preparation tips to crack the CTET exam without any difficulty.
Check NowThe Tamil Nadu Government filed a review petition in the Supreme Court challenging its September 1 order mandating that all serving teachers clear the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) within two years to continue in service.
New: CTET Question/Sample Papers
Don't Miss: CTET 2025 Preparation Tips
Don't Miss: Upcoming Government Exams
According to The New Indian Express , School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi told reporters on Tuesday that the review petition challenges the apex court’s order and connected matters. He said retrospective enforcement would affect around 3.28 lakh teachers with more than five years of service and about 67,000 nearing retirement.
The SC order states that in-service teachers with less than five years of service remaining will have to qualify for TET to be eligible for promotion. Teachers failing to do so within the given time frame may be compulsorily retired, though terminal benefits would be provided if they have completed the qualifying service.
“If these experienced teachers are declared unqualified or forced to retire, classrooms across thousands of schools would remain vacant, jeopardising the education of millions of children,” Poyyamozhi said, according to The New Indian Express.
Also read ‘Insult to years of service’: West Bengal teachers oppose TET mandate, suggest alternate training
Government seeks exemption for pre-2010 appointees
The Minister further added that the state is considering introducing special legislation in the forthcoming Assembly session to protect teachers and prevent disruption in the school education system.
He referred to the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) notification dated August 23, 2010, which exempted teachers appointed before that date from the TET requirement, and said the Government has prayed that this exemption be upheld.
Poyyamozhi said that the Government has sought clarity that pre-2010 appointees should remain eligible for promotion, while the TET rule should apply prospectively only to new appointments and promotions after 2010.
As per The New Indian Express, the minister warned that enforcing the Supreme Court order without modification could create a shortage of nearly four lakh teachers, severely impacting the Right to Education for rural, hilly, and marginalised children dependent on Government schools.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- 2025 for Education: VBSA Bill, CBSE board exams, NAAC accreditation scam – big policies, bigger controversies
- PU Chandigarh: Stalled promotions, ‘discriminatory’ rules push college teachers to renew parity demand
- ‘Last democratic step’: Why 200 OUAT Bhubaneswar research scholars are on hunger strike
- MBBS Abroad: Indian students in Bangladesh medical colleges safe, but fresh violence keeps them on edge
- Post-Al Falah, Haryana expands control, can shut private universities over national security concerns
- Study in India falls short on visa issues, curricula; NITI Aayog sets 5 lakh foreign students target for 2047
- JEE Advanced reports show IITs cut hundreds of BTech seats in core engineering; here’s what happened
- Exam déjà vu? AMU law faculty reuses last year’s BA LLB Hons question paper; students oppose retest
- Pre, Post-Matric Scholarships for minorities disbursed to thousands of ineligible or fake beneficiaries: CAG
- PMKVY: CAG flags missing names from Skill India scheme, 34 lakh losing payout due to poor NSDC oversight