Tamil Nadu files review petition against SC TET order affecting serving teachers
Vikas Kumar Pandit | September 30, 2025 | 02:09 PM IST | 2 mins read
The state says retrospective enforcement of the TET rule could impact over 3 lakh teachers with years of service left. Pre-2010 appointees may lose promotion eligibility, creating shortages that could disrupt education for rural and marginalised children.
Know all about the analysis and preparation tips to crack the CTET exam without any difficulty.
Check NowThe Tamil Nadu Government filed a review petition in the Supreme Court challenging its September 1 order mandating that all serving teachers clear the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) within two years to continue in service.
Latest: CTET Question/Sample Papers
Don't Miss: CTET Preparation Tips
Also See: Upcoming Government Exams
According to The New Indian Express , School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi told reporters on Tuesday that the review petition challenges the apex court’s order and connected matters. He said retrospective enforcement would affect around 3.28 lakh teachers with more than five years of service and about 67,000 nearing retirement.
The SC order states that in-service teachers with less than five years of service remaining will have to qualify for TET to be eligible for promotion. Teachers failing to do so within the given time frame may be compulsorily retired, though terminal benefits would be provided if they have completed the qualifying service.
“If these experienced teachers are declared unqualified or forced to retire, classrooms across thousands of schools would remain vacant, jeopardising the education of millions of children,” Poyyamozhi said, according to The New Indian Express.
Also read ‘Insult to years of service’: West Bengal teachers oppose TET mandate, suggest alternate training
Government seeks exemption for pre-2010 appointees
The Minister further added that the state is considering introducing special legislation in the forthcoming Assembly session to protect teachers and prevent disruption in the school education system.
He referred to the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) notification dated August 23, 2010, which exempted teachers appointed before that date from the TET requirement, and said the Government has prayed that this exemption be upheld.
Poyyamozhi said that the Government has sought clarity that pre-2010 appointees should remain eligible for promotion, while the TET rule should apply prospectively only to new appointments and promotions after 2010.
As per The New Indian Express, the minister warned that enforcing the Supreme Court order without modification could create a shortage of nearly four lakh teachers, severely impacting the Right to Education for rural, hilly, and marginalised children dependent on Government schools.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- UGC control, scholar attacks, sackings: India’s academic freedom ‘severely restricted’ in 2026, says SAR
- ‘Leak in education’: Delhi Govt drops land rule, helps 2,000 unrecognised pvt schools get legal sanction
- India added 196 public universities in 15 years, but most barely functional; private ones outnumber them
- ‘SVGU Ahmedabad equipping students to fill industry gaps, look beyond basic qualifications’: Provost
- Mumbai’s Saifee Hospital seeks Rs 125 crore in damages from DNB trainee who attempted suicide
- BHU Admission 2026: BFA candidates stunned by practical exam scores; demand answers and inquiry
- PMS Scholarship: 50% Tamil Nadu schools skipped, thousands of payments delayed, duplicated, finds CAG audit
- ‘Politics minus education’: Why West Bengal colleges are wary of govt-appointed governing body presidents
- 12 DU colleges, just 1 with hostels: Why students are forced into PGs like the one collapsed in Satya Niketan
- Gautam Buddha University student ordered to sign Rs 5-lakh bond over ‘anti-govt propaganda’, CJP protest