Tamil Nadu files review petition against SC TET order affecting serving teachers
Vikas Kumar Pandit | September 30, 2025 | 02:09 PM IST | 2 mins read
The state says retrospective enforcement of the TET rule could impact over 3 lakh teachers with years of service left. Pre-2010 appointees may lose promotion eligibility, creating shortages that could disrupt education for rural and marginalised children.
Know all about the analysis and preparation tips to crack the CTET exam without any difficulty.
Check NowThe Tamil Nadu Government filed a review petition in the Supreme Court challenging its September 1 order mandating that all serving teachers clear the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) within two years to continue in service.
New: CTET 2026 Admit Card Out; Download Now
Latest: CTET Question/Sample Papers
Don't Miss: CTET Preparation Tips
Also See: Upcoming Government Exams
According to The New Indian Express , School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi told reporters on Tuesday that the review petition challenges the apex court’s order and connected matters. He said retrospective enforcement would affect around 3.28 lakh teachers with more than five years of service and about 67,000 nearing retirement.
The SC order states that in-service teachers with less than five years of service remaining will have to qualify for TET to be eligible for promotion. Teachers failing to do so within the given time frame may be compulsorily retired, though terminal benefits would be provided if they have completed the qualifying service.
“If these experienced teachers are declared unqualified or forced to retire, classrooms across thousands of schools would remain vacant, jeopardising the education of millions of children,” Poyyamozhi said, according to The New Indian Express.
Also read ‘Insult to years of service’: West Bengal teachers oppose TET mandate, suggest alternate training
Government seeks exemption for pre-2010 appointees
The Minister further added that the state is considering introducing special legislation in the forthcoming Assembly session to protect teachers and prevent disruption in the school education system.
He referred to the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) notification dated August 23, 2010, which exempted teachers appointed before that date from the TET requirement, and said the Government has prayed that this exemption be upheld.
Poyyamozhi said that the Government has sought clarity that pre-2010 appointees should remain eligible for promotion, while the TET rule should apply prospectively only to new appointments and promotions after 2010.
As per The New Indian Express, the minister warned that enforcing the Supreme Court order without modification could create a shortage of nearly four lakh teachers, severely impacting the Right to Education for rural, hilly, and marginalised children dependent on Government schools.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Galgotias University: 2,297 patents filed, just 1% granted; with 63%, IITs far ahead of private institutes
- Samajwadi Party calls Galgotias University’s robot dog display ‘mockery of UP’, says ‘cancel recognition’
- CBSE: APAAR ID must for LOC registration from 2026-27 session; two-level Class 10 exams from 2028
- Less bias, more risk? CBSE on-screen marking system leaves Class 12 students, teachers cautious but optimistic
- CBSE Plans: Compulsory computing, AI in Classes 9, 10 syllabus; more skill subjects; 25% EWS quota review
- CBSE 2026: Board tightens rules on cheating, makes it harder to pass; Class 10 gets new marksheets
- NEET PG Counselling: Maharashtra body orders medical college to admit student it refused over fees
- Anna University engineering colleges sack over 300 temp teachers; defiance of court orders, says association
- ChatGPT for education? IIT Madras director on how Bodhan AI will work and what it can do
- CBSE Board Exams 2026: NHRC says withholding admit cards over fee dispute ‘illegal’, violates RTE Act