MK Stalin opposes proposal to replace English with Hindi as medium of instruction in IITs, KVs
Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin criticized the recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee on Official Language as a “direct onslaught on India's soul”.
Anu Parthiban | October 10, 2022 | 03:44 PM IST
NEW DELHI: The "Hindi imposition" debate has erupted once again after the parliamentary panel suggested that the medium of instruction in IITs, central universities and Kendriya Vidyalayas in Hindi-speaking states should be Hindi and in other parts of India their respective local language.
Tamil Nadu chief minister MK Stalin in a Twitter thread criticized the proposals made in the 11th volume of the report of the Parliamentary Committee on Official Language and said that the recommendations are a “direct onslaught on India's soul”.
He pointed out that the report has recommended that English be replaced with Hindi as the medium of instruction in all central institutions like Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AllMS), central universities and Kendriya Vidyalayas.
The Tamil Nadu chief minister said that the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution has 22 languages including Tamil entitled to equal rights, and questioned what made “the Union home minister Amit Shah-led committee to recommend that Hindi be made the common language of India”.
He further questioned why the committee recommended discontinuing English language question papers in the union recruitment examinations to give preference for Hindi.
Also read | Teaching MBBS in Hindi is a good idea, but where are quality textbooks? question medical experts
Stating that the imposition of Hindi is against the integrity of India, the CM said, “It is against the spirit of the Constitution to provide undue, unfair advantage to Hindi and discriminate against other Indian languages while raising "Bharat Mata ki Jai" as a political slogan in the parliament.”
“If implemented, the vast non-Hindi speaking population will be made second-class citizens in their own land,” CM MK Stalin said.
If implemented, the vast non-Hindi speaking population will be made second-class citizens in their own land.
— M.K.Stalin (@mkstalin) October 10, 2022
Imposing Hindi is against the integrity of India.
The BJP govt would do well to learn lessons from the Anti-Hindi agitations in the past. #StopHindiImposition 2/2 pic.twitter.com/0R1IuvtzEx
The committee suggested that in all technical and non-technical institutions in the country, Hindi or local language should be used as the medium of instruction and the use of English should be made optional, sources said, as per PTI report.
BJP member Rita Bahuguna Joshi said English is an “alien language” and “we want it to be eliminated” and it should be replaced by Hindi and other regional languages.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Over 15,000 professors of practice in universities; just 80 in IITs: Education ministry
- 60% of law school legal aid clinics have not assisted any lawyer in any case: Supreme Court report
- IIT Placements 2024-2025: Startup surge, diverse job roles raise hopes for a comeback season
- Maharashtra regulator rejects state proposal to raise management quota fees in AYUSH colleges
- PMKVY Scheme: 40% of 1.5 crore in skill training women; electronics, apparel top sectors
- NEHU in turmoil: How governance issues and lack of transparency in appointments sparked a campus-wide unrest
- Education ministry: 1.65 crore non-literates register on ULLAS portal, less than half clear literacy test
- Over 5,000 teaching vacancies, 2,000 unfilled reserved posts in central universities: Education ministry
- Delay in NTA exam payments due to ‘late submission’ of bills, education ministry tells Lok Sabha
- Maharashtra NEET UG Counselling: MBBS aspirant moves HC against medical college for ‘overcharging’