UCEED Exam Analysis - Exam Moderately Difficult
Team Careers360 | January 17, 2021 | 12:36 PM IST | 2 mins read
UCEED 2021 was successfully conducted midst Covid-19, the entrance test was moderately difficult.
Download the ebook to practice most repeated UCEED questions, important topics, PYQs, visual reasoning & design aptitude trends for effective exam prep.
Download EBookNEW DELHI - IIT Bombay has successfully conducted UCEED 2021 today from 9 am to 12 noon in various exam centres. According to the experts and input from test-takers, UCEED 2021 is moderately difficult. As per the test-takers feedback, they did not face any problem during the exam.
UCEED 2027: Syllabus | Exam Pattern | How to prepare for NAT Questions
UCEED 2027: Preparation Tips | Study Material | High Weightage Topics
UCEED 2027: Most Repeated Questions and Topics | PYQ's
Both the parts of UCEED i,e Part A and Part B were held on the same day. Test-takers got a maximum 180 minutes to complete the exam in which 150 minutes is allotted for Part A and 30 minutes for Part B. UCEED 2021 Part A consists of three sections which are Numerical Answer Type (NAT), Multiple Select Question (MSQ) and Multiple Choice Question (MCQ). Part B consists of one question where the question is displayed on the screen, however, the response in the answer book provided by the invigilator.
UCEED 2021 Exam Analysis
|
Section |
Number of questions |
Difficulty level |
|
Part A |
||
|
Numerical Answer Type (NAT) |
18 |
Moderately difficult |
|
Multiple Select Question (MSQ) |
18 |
Easy |
|
Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) |
32 |
Moderate |
|
Part B |
||
|
Drawing |
1 |
|
UCEED Exam Analysis 2021 - Key Features
-
UCEED 2021 is divided into two parts - Part A and Part B. In Part A, questions were asked from the topics observation and design sensitivity, visualization and spatial ability, environmental and social awareness, language and creativity, analytical and logical reasoning and design thinking & problem-solving.
-
Part B consisted of one question which tested a candidate’s drawing skills. The question of Part B is displayed on the screen, however, candidates answer on the answer sheet provided by invigilator. Part B question was mandatory to answer.
-
There were a total of 69 questions to be solved in the span of 180 minutes.
-
For each correct answer, 4 marks are awarded in NAT & MSQ and 3 marks in MCQ section of Part A. There was no negative marking for the NAT section. But −0.19 and −0.71 were deducted for each wrong answer of MSQ and MCQ section respectively.
According to Deepika Dubey, the difficulty level of UCEED 2021 lies between moderate to difficult. The MCQ section was easy among all sections. The NAT section was tougher and the MSQ section was moderate. However, few other candidates found UCEED 2021 more challenging and tricky.
Write to us news@careers360.com
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- NEET Exam: Why more women qualify, top the lists, but still can't make it to AIIMS
- Anna University students piece together BTech courses as faculty gaps lead to fragmented teaching
- NCERT teaching shame, not respect; blurring of Mohenjo-daro ‘Dancing Girl’ in book draws criticism
- NTA must publish ‘implementation roadmap’ for reforms recommended by HLCE: Parliament panel
- ‘Major financial project’: Tamil Nadu parents say private school fee disclosure rule will help plan education
- From farm work at 10 to Padma Shri at 70: Mahendra Nath Roy’s journey to become world’s top 2% scientist
- Across universities, 4th year of NEP’s FYUP more about confusion than research or practical training
- IITs will test new JEE Advanced format on first-year BTech students this year: IIT Kanpur director
- Delhi Govt school alumnus builds learning, skill development platform; reaches 5,000 underserved students
- ‘BTech Not Enough’: Outdated engineering curriculum leaves students paying to bridge classroom-to-career gap