Delhi High Court seeks NTA stand on plea by JEE aspirant declared ineligible for Advance exam
Press Trust of India | August 12, 2022 | 07:34 PM IST | 2 mins read
NTA told the Delhi High Court that the score card presented by the petitioner was false, has no credibility, and cannot be relied upon.
Download JEE Advanced Last 15 Years Question Papers PDF with solutions. Practise previous year questions, understand trends and boost your preparation.
Download EBookNEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has sought the stand of the National Testing Agency (NTA) on a petition by a candidate alleging that he has been wrongly declared “ineligible” for applying to the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) (Advance) despite securing above benchmark scores in the JEE (Main).
JEE Advanced 2027: Syllabus | Preparation Tips | Chapter-Wise Weightage
New: JEE Advanced 2026: Hardest, Easiest & Tricky Questions
Latest: JEE Advanced 2026- QP | Analysis | PYQ's (Last 15 Years)
Don't Miss: JEE Advanced Trigonometry Previous Year Questions
The petitioner said that as per his score-cards, downloaded from the NTA portal, he secured a percentile of 98.79 and 99.23 in the first and second sessions, respectively, of the Mains examination but at the time of applying for the Advance examination, he learnt that as per the authorities, his percentile is 20.767 and 14.64.
NTA told the court that the score card presented by the petitioner was false, has no credibility, and cannot be relied upon. Justice Sanjeev Narula, for now, allowed the petitioner to apply for the Advance examination, clarifying that whether he would be permitted to take the exam, which is scheduled for August 28, would be decided after perusing the relevant documents.
Also read | Veer Gatha Project: Valour of soldiers to be included in school curriculum, says Dharmendra Pradhan
The court directed NTA to file a short affidavit in the matter and also place before it all relevant records, including the response sheet of the petitioner and listed the case for further hearing on August 18. “In order for the court to form an opinion, the Respondents are to be afforded an opportunity to produce the documents noted above.
Accordingly, NTA is directed to file a short affidavit on the above aspects, along with all relevant records, including the response sheet of the Petitioner, within a period of five days from today,” said the court in its order dated August 11 “It is made clear that the Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, even on a prima facie basis. No special equity shall be claimed by the Petitioner or enure to his benefit on the basis of above directions,”. It added. The court also issued notice to the Centre on the petition and permitted it to file its response.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- Maharashtra NEET UG Counselling: HC refuses to let medical college hold own MBBS rounds, says plea ‘premature’
- NEET PG Counselling: At private medical colleges, deemed-university tag brings up to 1,471% fee hike
- ‘Didn't call police,’ IIT Bombay deputy director tells faculty members; prof questions response
- AI engineer builds app for blind students in higher education; over 1,000 use it to read in 30 languages
- ‘Teachers know…’: In Chennai govt schools, drugs move through classrooms, playgrounds – unchecked, unreported
- St Stephen’s terminates 2 assistant professors appointed during ex-principal’s tenure over irregularities
- NIT Karnataka’s entrepreneurship model goes beyond incubators and into classrooms; now it’ll guide other NITs
- Defunding Liberal Arts: When sociology and history learning fades, social media influencers fill the gap
- Section of JBIMS grads without jobs, say placement team ‘not taking responsibility’; B-school blames students
- No lab, little funds, full-time job: Midnight equations land Tumkur University prof on top 2% scientists list