Karnataka HC allows Govt to conduct board exams for Classes 5, 8, 9, and 11
Press Trust of India | March 22, 2024 | 05:42 PM IST | 2 mins read
Karnataka HC's decision now allows the government to continue and complete the halted exams for classes 5, 8, and 9 and also finish evaluation Class 11 exams.
BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Friday granted permission to the State Government to proceed with the conduct of board exams for classes 5,8, 9 and 11 for the academic year 2023-24, overturning the March six order of a single judge bench. The decision of the division bench comprising Justice K Somashekar and Justice Rajesh Rai K, came after the State Government filed an appeal challenging the earlier ruling.
The single judge's verdict had nullified the State Government's decision, made in October 2023, to hold board exams for these classes through the Karnataka State Examination and Assessment Board (KSEAB). The judge had argued that the scheme for conducting these exams lacked the necessary framework provided by Sections 22 and 145 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which mandate the formulation of rules for implementing the examination system and require input from stakeholders before finalising such rules.
The division bench's ruling interpreted the notifications issued by the State Government regarding the board exams as guidelines rather than strict regulations, based on its understanding of the powers granted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
The court's decision now allows the government to continue and complete the halted exams for classes 5, 8, and 9 and also finish evaluating the exams conducted for class 11. The exams for classes 5, 8, and 9 were stopped midway following a judgment by the apex court, creating uncertainty among students and educational institutions. The bench also directed the government to engage in consultations with stakeholders before issuing a formal notification for conducting board exams for the next academic year.
This emphasis on stakeholder input aligns with the principles of inclusive decision-making and ensures that the concerns and perspectives of all relevant parties are taken into account. The legal proceedings surrounding this issue also involved interventions from the Supreme Court . Initially, the division bench had passed an interim order on March 7 in favour of the government's stance on conducting the exams.
However, this interim order was set aside by the Supreme Court on March 12, directing the bench to thoroughly review the appeal on its merits. After hearing arguments from both the State Government and petitioner-school associations on March 18, the division bench deliberated on the matter and delivered its verdict on Friday.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- SRCC false caste-bias case: DU college says ‘no such incident’ but video viral amid UGC equity regulations row
- Economic Survey 2026: Make India ‘education tourism’ hub; offer international students Ayurveda, yoga courses
- Economic Survey 2026 proposes NIRF-like school ranking, PISA-type Class 10 test, more composite schools
- From Rohith to Reform: UGC Equity Regulations 2026, born from tragedies, threaten caste dominance, not merit
- Law School For All: IGNOU is drawing lawyers, cops, CAs, even sitting judges with revamped legal courses
- ‘Autonomy Snatched’: Revised ISI Bill faces opposition in council; academics reject new MoSPI draft
- What are UGC Equity Regulations 2026 and why are they facing ‘general-category’ backlash?
- NITs plan multiple-entry, exit in BTech across institutes, research parks with ADB loan, PhD reform
- Environmental Law: NLU Odisha, Assam, Northeast law schools are making tribal rights core of curriculum
- ‘Generative AI knowledge limited to ChatGPT’: Why law schools are launching artificial intelligence centres