NEET UG 2021: SC issues notice on plea alleging "rigging" of OMR sheets, discrepancies in final results
Vagisha Kaushik | November 29, 2021 | 05:05 PM IST | 2 mins read
Six petitioners said there is a huge gap between the marks calculated by them on the basis of answer keys published by NTA and the final scores released on Nov 1.
Download the NEET 2026 Free Mock Test PDF with detailed solutions. Practice real exam-style questions, analyze your performance, and enhance your preparation.
Download EBookNEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has issued a notice in a plea filed by six National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for undergraduate, NEET UG candidates who alleged “rigging of OMR sheets” after publication of answer keys and discrepancies in NEET UG result 2021 by the National Testing Agency (NTA), the LiveLaw reported.
Also Read | NEET UG 2021: Supreme Court directs relief for PwD candidate who sought directions for re-exam
Alleging discrepancies in the scoring process, the candidates have challenged their marks and ranks secured in NEET UG 2021 conducted on September 12, the report said.
A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna was hearing the petition, it said.
Also Read | NEET PG 2021: MBBS graduates move Kerala HC challenging 27% quota to SEBC
The petitioners argued there is a huge gap between the marks calculated by them on the basis of answer keys published by NTA and the final scores released by the agency on November 1. While one of the petitioners alleged that his calculated score was 564 as per the answer key but the result displayed 164, another alleged that his score was supposed to be 675 according to the answer key but he only got 52 marks in the final result.
"It appears that to be massive rigging in the screening of the OMR sheet soon after the publication of the answer keys and consequent uploading of OMR sheet for self assessment and before the actual declaration of result and score card on NTA's website which has resulted in glaring discrepancy in the marks obtained by the petitioners," the plea said.
Also Read | NEET PG Counselling 2021: Centre decides to revisit Rs 8 lakh criteria for EWS; Counselling postponed
Looking at the huge difference, the petitioners have argued it is quite evident that there is something wrong on the part of NTA which should be dealt with by initiating investigations against it.
Ever since the NEET UG 2021 exam was conducted, several issues of “discrepancies” in either results or question papers have surfaced.
Also Read | ‘We sympathise with students, but sorry’: SC refuses NEET UG re-exam for 2 students
Recently, NTA agreed before the top court to examine the alleged error in Hindi translation of a physics question in the NEET exam.
The plea had sought direction to NTA to delete the question from the physics section and declare fresh NEET UG results 2021.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Galgotias University: 2,297 patents filed, just 1% granted; with 63%, IITs far ahead of private institutes
- Samajwadi Party calls Galgotias University’s robot dog display ‘mockery of UP’, says ‘cancel recognition’
- CBSE: APAAR ID must for LOC registration from 2026-27 session; two-level Class 10 exams from 2028
- Less bias, more risk? CBSE on-screen marking system leaves Class 12 students, teachers cautious but optimistic
- CBSE Plans: Compulsory computing, AI in Classes 9, 10 syllabus; more skill subjects; 25% EWS quota review
- CBSE 2026: Board tightens rules on cheating, makes it harder to pass; Class 10 gets new marksheets
- NEET PG Counselling: Maharashtra body orders medical college to admit student it refused over fees
- Anna University engineering colleges sack over 300 temp teachers; defiance of court orders, says association
- ChatGPT for education? IIT Madras director on how Bodhan AI will work and what it can do
- CBSE Board Exams 2026: NHRC says withholding admit cards over fee dispute ‘illegal’, violates RTE Act