CLAT 2018: Unsatisfied with testing method, SC directs MHRD to take penal action against NUALS
Apratim Chatterjee | June 14, 2018 | 05:27 PM IST | 2 mins read
Know your admission chances in National Law Universities based on your home state & exam result for All India Category & State Category seats.
Try NowNEW DELHI, JUNE 14: The Supreme Court, in an order on June 13, reprimanded the National University of Advanced Legal Studies Kochi (NUALS) on the way it held the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) on May 13, 2018. The SC bench of Justices UU Lalit and Deepak Gupta also asked the Union Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD) to appoint a committee to look into the irregularity and take appropriate measures including penal actions against the exam conducting body.
New: CLAT 2026 2nd Provisional Allotment List Out
CLAT 2026 Tools: College Predictor
CLAT 2026: Opening and Closing Ranks | Expected Cutoff | Marks vs Rank
Admission Alert: Law Applications Open at Jindal Global Law School
The apex court order, which came exactly after a month of the national-level law examination, sternly pointed out that the court was not at all satisfied with the way examination was conducted. The Supreme Court also marked that it was the duty of the conducting NLU to ensure proper facilities at the CLAT 2018 exam centres.
The Supreme Court order reads, “We must record that we are not at all satisfied with the way the examination was conducted. The body which was given the task of conducting the examination was duty bound to ensure facilities of uninterrupted UPS and generator facility. The record indicates complete inadequacy on that point.”
SC’s directions to MHRD
In addition to rebuking NUALS, the Supreme Court has also directed the Union Ministry of Human Resources and Development to appoint a committee to look into the irregularities.
“It is therefore directed to the HRD Ministry to appoint a Committee to look into the matter and take ‘appropriate remedial measures, including penal action’, against the body entrusted with the conduct of the examination,” the Court order read.
The SC also asked the MHRD to ensure that no such instances are repeated in future editions of CLAT. The Court also observed that the tradition of giving the responsibility of the conduct of CLAT to different NLUs every year needs to be revisited.
The Court further stated that the fees candidates had to shell out were 'far in excess' compared to the amount spent on the testing process by the exam conducting body.
The SC asked MHRD to get the special committee report on all the issues within three months.
Following the Supreme Court’s directions, the petitions pending in various High Courts were directed to be disposed of.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Featured News
]- ‘No TET’: Schools teachers’ jobs at risk, hundreds in Delhi to rally against mandatory eligibility tests
- NCAHP draft policy curbs state role in allied and healthcare course design; grants power to verify institutes
- Private employees in government schools, Assam vocational teachers want 3rd-party agencies out of their jobs
- India saw 93,000 schools shut down over last 10 years; MP, UP lead closures, govt tells Lok Sabha
- Skill India Mission’s JSS scheme needs higher budget, infrastructure boost: Govt cites study in parliament
- Legal jobs boom with riders – master AI, intern longer, practise 3 years for judicial services
- School Education Budget 2026: Atal Tinkering Labs gain big; small hikes for Samagra Shiksha, mid-day meals
- Education Budget 2026: OBC, ST scholarships get Rs 1,000 crore boost, minority scheme funds slashed
- Budget 2026: Higher education outlay up 11%; Rs 200 crore for PM Research Chairs; PM USHA sees 55% cut in RE
- Health Education Budget 2026: Major boost to allied health sciences, 3 new AIIAs, NIMHANS in north India