HC seeks Centre, UGC's detailed replies on plea against DU admission in law course through CLAT
Press Trust of India | August 30, 2023 | 01:16 PM IST | 2 mins read
Delhi University has stopped the 5-year LLB admission 2023 process till decision on CLAT score.
Download list of Colleges/ Universities Accpeting CUET Score with Cut-OFFs
Download NowNEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has sought detailed replies from the Centre and the UGC over a plea against the Delhi University's decision to admit students to five-year integrated law courses solely based on the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-UG), 2023, and not the Common University Entrance Test.
Don't Miss: NIRF DU Colleges Ranking
The court passed the order on August 25 after the Centre's counsel said CUET was not mandatory for central universities as they enjoy autonomy in matters of admission while the UGC's lawyer took a contrary stand.
"(Centre's lawyer) has categorically stated that, the Common University Entrance Test is not mandatory for central universities and that they enjoy autonomy in the matter of admission... University Grants Commission (lawyer) categorically states that it is mandatory for all central universities to adhere to the CUET for admission to UG/ PG programmes," noted a bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula.
Also Read | Delhi University stops 5-year LLB admission 2023 process till decision on CLAT score: Report
"UGC as well as Union of India are granted one week's time to file a detailed counter-affidavit," the bench said. Petitioner Prince Singh, a law student at Campus Law Centre in Delhi University, argued in his petition that the university while issuing the impugned notification, imposed a "wholly unreasonable and arbitrary condition" that the admission to five-year integrated law courses shall be solely based upon merit in the CLAT-UG 2023 result, which is violative of the Right to Equality under Article 14 and Right to Education under Article 21.
The plea stated that the condition lacks any intelligible differentia and has no rational nexus with the object of admission to the five-year integrated law courses at the Faculty of Law. It sought that admission to the five-year integrated law courses be done through the CUET-UG, 2023. In his petition, Singh said that CUET-UG 2023 was for admission to all undergraduate programmes in central universities for the academic session 2023-24.
Earlier this month, the high court questioned Delhi University's decision to admit students to five-year integrated law courses solely based on CLAT-UG, 2023. The court had said that when other central universities were taking admissions for the course based on CUET UG 2023 introduced by the Ministry of Education, Delhi University was "not special". The matter would be heard next on September 12.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- IIT Bombay scraps stricter cheating rules, restores original ‘student-friendly’ norms after campus suicide
- DU college students plan 5 years to bring International Conference of Physics Students to India
- ‘Locally rooted, nationally relevant’: NLU Meghalaya VC on CLAT-only admissions, new LLB courses, research
- ‘Hacker’s bent of mind’: IIT Kanpur, Madras B.Cybersecurity course to train ‘cyber warriors’, says in-charge
- A decade on, Mahatma Gandhi Central University has 5 campuses, none permanent; CAG flags lapses
- Visva-Bharati: SC, ST, OBC forum seeks audit of VBU’s spending, recruitment; writes to education ministry
- MGCU Motihari’s expulsion of MA student unfair; Patna HC orders university to reinstate him
- Maharashtra: MAFSU Nagpur gets first pvt veterinary, dairy technology colleges, doubles BVSc & AH seats
- West Bengal forms panel to decide fate of 933 schools with no students, may hand buildings to other depts
- ‘Not individual failure’: IIT Bombay students protest suicide, want director to quit, action against professor