NEET UG 2024: NTA revises tie-breaking rule, scraps computerised draw policy to decide rank
NEET UG revised information bulletin out at exams.nta.ac.in/NEET/. The extended date for registration ends tomorrow.
This ebook serves as a valuable study guide for NEET exams, specifically designed to assist students in light of recent changes and the removal of certain topics from the NEET exam.
Download EBookAnu Parthiban | March 15, 2024 | 05:58 PM IST
NEW DELHI: The National Testing Agency (NTA) has revised the tie-breaking rule for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test - Undergraduate (NEET UG 2024). The computerised draw of lots rule for breaking ties has been scrapped and the old rule of allotting ranks based on number of correct and incorrect answers will be used instead.
NEET 2025: Mock Test (Free) | Biology: Mind Maps & Important Diagrams
NEET 2025: Syllabus | Most Scoring concepts | NEET PYQ's (2015-24)
New: Meet Careers360 experts in your city and get guidance on shortlisting colleges
New Programme: B.E Environmental & Sustainability @ BITS Pilani for PCB Candidates
The NEET UG registration extended deadline is March 16. Candidates who are yet to apply will have to submit the application form on the official website, exams.nta.ac.in/NEET/. Around 25 lakh candidates have registered for NEET so far, of which approximately 13 lakh are female applicants, as per reports.
The NEET UG exam will be held on May 5 in pen and paper format at 544 exam cities in India and 14 exam cities abroad. Based on the scores secured by candidates, the NTA prepares a merit list for 15% All India quota seats.
NEET UG tie-breaking method
NEET is the single-largest entrance exam in India. As a result, the chances of candidates scoring the same marks are high. To resolve this issue, the NTA follows a tie-breaking method.
The National Medical Commission (NMC) announced a new tie-breaking rule last year, as per Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 ( GMER-23 ). As per which, marks obtained in biology, chemistry and physics will be considered, in this order, for deciding “the inter-se-merit of candidates for tie-breaking”. If the tie still remains, “draw of lots by using the computer or IT with no human intervention” will be used, it said.
However, the computerised draw policy has been removed this year. The NTA will now be using the old tie-breaking policy given below.
- Candidate obtaining higher marks/percentile score in biology - botany and zoology - followed by,
- Candidate obtaining higher marks/percentile score in chemistry, followed by,
- Candidate obtaining higher marks/percentile score in physics, followed by,
- Candidate with less proportion of the number of attempted incorrect answers and correct answers in all the subjects,
- Candidate with less proportion of a number of attempted incorrect answers and correct answers in biology, followed by,
- Candidate with less proportion of a number of attempted incorrect answers and correct answers in chemistry, followed by
- Candidate with less proportion of a number of attempted incorrect answers and correct answers in physics in the test.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- ICSI study material enough to clear CSEET; absolutely against private coaching: President
- Navigating Uncertainty: How Ivy League aspirants can tackle US visa challenges
- Education in Manipur: Futures at risk as ethnic violence derails academic dreams of over 50,000 students
- SC enrollment 5.2%, ST’s negligible 1%: Panel flags forward caste dominance in top private universities
- ITEP set for exponential growth as 1,400 institutes seek to launch new four-year teacher training course
- Holding CBSE Class 10 twice can lead to ‘paper leaks, irregularities’, warns parliament panel
- Reservation in private universities, NTA annual reports, CUET review among Parliament panel’s recommendations
- Biodiversity Courses: Central University of Odisha caught in the middle of research vs jobs debate
- ‘Not justified’ to withhold SSA funds over PM SHRI schools: Parliament panel
- PhD admission gaps: Why marginalised candidates struggle to fill reserved seats across central universities