AICTE clarifies concerns on mandatory teacher training for faculty promotions
The AICTE advises authorities and universities not to delay promotions for senior faculty lacking mandatory training, allowing promotions upon completion of training within 12 months, provided other requirements are met.
Alivia Mukherjee | June 2, 2024 | 10:26 PM IST
NEW DELHI: The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), has issued a clarification concerning the compulsory teacher training outlined in the AICTE Regulation 2019, which was published on March 1, 2019. This clarification aims to address concerns raised by faculty members and technical education directors regarding the potential implications of this requirement on their promotion prospects.
The Council, in a communication directed to all principals and directors of technical Education, said that multiple representations have been received regarding the mandatory training requirement for senior faculty members aspiring for promotion to higher scales. As per AICTE, non-fulfillment of this training requirement has led to delays in promotions.
The AICTE notice read, "The Council is in receipt of numerous representations from faculty members and letter from principals, director of technical education seeking clarification on mandatory teachers training applicable for senior faculty members for their eligible promotion to higher scales. lt has come to the notice of council that the promotions to higher scales of faculty members are held up due to the want of mandatory fulfillment of training. "
Mandatory teacher training requirement for promotion
In order to address this concern, the AICTE has recommended that appointing authorities, state directorates of technical education, and affiliating universities should refrain from delaying the promotion of eligible senior faculty members solely due to the non-fulfilment of mandatory training. Promotions may proceed under the condition that the faculty members undergo the required training within 12 months from the issuance of this clarification. However, this is subject to the fulfillment of other criteria specified in the relevant promotion notification for advancement to a higher scale.
Evaluating relevancy of courses
However, the appointing authority, the affiliating university, or the directorate of technical education, as the case may be, should determine the relevancy of courses taken by faculty members with more than five years of experience as part of their training.
If you want to share your experience at work, talk about hiring trends or discuss internships, write to us at theworkplace@careers360.com. To know more about The Workplace itself, here's a handy note: Let’s talk work…
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- MBA Jobs: Consulting jobs rise in top B-school placements amid declining salaries, slowdown
- IIT fee revision might be on the cards; education ministry panel to examine institute finances
- IMI Delhi adopting ‘comprehensive branding strategy’ to improve NIRF rank among b-schools
- Despite good record, SRCC’s PGDM in Global Business Operations faces degree hurdle
- How IIM Mumbai, IIM Ahmedabad, and other B-Schools are waking up to the era of MBA in sustainability
- Despite IIM Calcutta legacy, West Bengal’s management education is stunted due to faculty crunch, funding woes
- MBA Admission: ‘PGDM at National Insurance Academy is industry focused; expansion plans in offing’
- IIT Placements 2024: No ‘highest package’ data this year to reduce students’ stress, decides panel
- CAT 2024: ‘Exam brought diversity hurdles to FMS but tweaks in MBA admissions helped balance engineering bias’
- Study Abroad: As US gears for Trump 2.0, mixed signals for Indian students; STEM fields offer hope