They are opposing for sake of opposition: DU VC on three-language formula, NEP implementation

NEW DELHI: Delhi University Vice-Chancellor Yogesh Singh has strongly defended the three-language formula proposed under the National Education Policy (NEP), dismissing criticism as politically motivated. In an exclusive interview with PTI, Singh said opposition to the policy is not based on academic concerns but rather on resistance to necessary educational reforms.

"The National Education Policy emphasises three languages -- one is the mother tongue, and students can choose any two other languages. The focus remains on the mother tongue, but the choice is open," Yogesh Singh told PTI.

"There is no reason for unnecessary fear in southern India. Students should be free to select languages as per their expectations and choices. This policy is meant to empower students, not impose any language on them. It provides flexibility and broader linguistic exposure, which is beneficial in today's globalised world," he said.

New things are happening in the country's education system and this is a change, he said, adding that at times, it is difficult to accept the change because it also comes with a cost. Clarifying a common misconception, Singh highlighted the distinction between the medium of instruction and language study.

"The Delhi University admits students from across the country. Here, students take English as the medium of instruction and in some courses, Hindi is available as well. However, if a student wants to study in a language like Gujarati, Marathi or Kannada, we do not have the facilities to provide that. But universities in Karnataka, Maharashtra or Gujarat will offer these facilities.

Also read No concept of dropping out in higher education, multiple options for students: Minister

Nation Education Policy

Students should go where such options are available," he explained. He stressed that limiting students' choices is detrimental to their academic growth. "In the past, we restricted choices because we lacked the infrastructure. Now, with India making significant strides in higher education, there is no need for such limitations," Singh said. He strongly criticised those opposing the three-language formula without substantial reasoning.

"When we are not forcing students to study a particular language, there is no question of opposing it unnecessarily. They are opposing for the sake of opposition. I do not see any merit in that argument," he asserted. Beyond the language debate, Singh praised the NEP as a landmark reform that shifts focus from rote learning to skill development, critical thinking and interdisciplinary education.

"The National Education Policy is one of the most progressive frameworks India has seen in decades. It moves away from rote learning and focuses on holistic development," he said. The policy also advocates for greater integration of technology in education, a shift that Singh believes is crucial. "Technology-driven learning, digital resources and blended teaching methods will redefine education.

Also read Reservation in private universities, NTA annual reports, CUET review among Parliament panel’s recommendations

India's education system

Universities must adapt to these changes to stay relevant," he said. While some critics argue that the NEP lacks clarity in implementation, Singh dismissed these concerns as premature. "Any major reform faces initial resistance. The NEP is designed to benefit students and over time, its positive impact will be evident," he asserted.

On the issue of regional languages, Singh reiterated that the NEP actively supports linguistic diversity rather than undermining any language. "The policy allows the use of regional languages in primary education and encourages linguistic inclusivity. It does not impose any restrictions," he clarified.

As the NEP continues to roll out across the country, Singh remains optimistic that its long-term benefits will outweigh any initial scepticism. "This policy is a step towards making India's education system more globally competitive while preserving its cultural and linguistic heritage," he concluded.