CLAT PG 2025 aspirants flag irregularities, file petition in Supreme Court
CLAT 2025: The petitioners seek a delay in the results and counselling process and oppose the Rs 12,000 fee requirement to raise objections to 12 answers.
Know your admission chances in National Law Universities based on your home state & exam result for All India Category & State Category seat.
Try NowVikas Kumar Pandit | December 5, 2024 | 04:19 PM IST
NEW DELHI: Two Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 candidates have filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the provisional answer key issued for the CLAT exam 2025. The petitioners, Anam Khan and Ayush Agarwal, who appeared in the CLAT 2025 exam for Master of Laws (LLM) admissions, allege several lapses in the conduct of the exam.
They claim that the CLAT 2025 provisional answer key has various errors and as many as 12 questions have been given wrong answers. The Consortium of National Law Universities conducted the exam on December 1, 2024, for postgraduate admissions and issued the CLAT 2025 answer key on December 2, 2024.
The petitioners object to the short timeframe given to raise objections to the provisional answer key, with the online portal closing on December 3 at 4 pm. The CLAT 2025 final answer key is scheduled to be published on December 9 and the results are to be announced on December 10, 2024.
Petitioners seek CLAT 2025 result delay
The petitioners have requested a delay in the publication of the CLAT 2025 results and the counselling process. They also object to the requirement that candidates must pay Rs 12,000 to raise objections to the 12 answers.
"It is submitted that even after charging an exorbitant fee of Rs 4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand Only) towards the examination fees, the Consortium accepted objections only upon payment of Rs 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) per objection," the petition stated.
Alleged CLAT 2025 discrimination
The petitioners further allege that they were not given equal treatment, as they received the sealed envelope containing the question paper and Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) response sheet only after 2 pm, despite being scheduled for 1.50 pm.
The petition contends that the improper conduct of the CLAT exam violated the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21A. The petitioners are represented by Advocates Manasi Bhushan, Shakshi Sharma, Sanjana Patel, Akshit Chaudhary, Chetan and Ankit Chaturvedi (AOR).
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Analysis: What the new UGC regulations on recruitment mean for academics, from assistant professor to VC
- Draft UGC rules draw flak as teachers oppose removal of contract staff cap, mandatory PhD for promotion
- Draft UGC regulations lift cap on contract teacher hiring, tighten control on VC appointments
- Close to 40 lakh students are enrolled in 1 lakh single-teacher schools: UDISE Plus 2023-24
- How did 1.88 crore children, over 17,000 schools vanish from UDISE Plus? The ministry must explain: Expert
- Why teachers are worried about semester system in West Bengal primary schools
- Universities need new AI, evaluation policies: Jindal Global Law School student who sued over results
- UDISE Plus 2023-24 shows school enrolment drop of 37 lakh spread across categories, levels
- Study Abroad 2025: UK, Australia, Italy drive student visa policy shifts; new study destinations emerge
- ‘MNLU Mumbai has a local-to-global approach; new campus in 2 years’: VC