CLAT PG 2025 aspirants flag irregularities, file petition in Supreme Court
Vikas Kumar Pandit | December 5, 2024 | 04:19 PM IST | 2 mins read
CLAT 2025: The petitioners seek a delay in the results and counselling process and oppose the Rs 12,000 fee requirement to raise objections to 12 answers.
Download CLAT 2027 sample paper PDF with the latest exam pattern. Practice descriptive questions, improve accuracy, and strengthen your preparation for the upcoming CLAT exam.
Download EbookNEW DELHI: Two Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 candidates have filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the provisional answer key issued for the CLAT exam 2025. The petitioners, Anam Khan and Ayush Agarwal, who appeared in the CLAT 2025 exam for Master of Laws (LLM) admissions, allege several lapses in the conduct of the exam.
New: CLAT 2027 Registration Link | 200 Important Legal Terms | 10 Habits to Crack Exam
Also See: CLAT Committee Report | Constitutional law | Quant | 50+ Idioms | 100+Percentage Ques.
CLAT 2027: 10 Must Have Skills | PYQ's with Solutions | 10 Big Myths | English Vocabulary Words
CLAT 2027: Mock Test | Sample Papers | Current Affairs: April | May | June | July
They claim that the CLAT 2025 provisional answer key has various errors and as many as 12 questions have been given wrong answers. The Consortium of National Law Universities conducted the exam on December 1, 2024, for postgraduate admissions and issued the CLAT 2025 answer key on December 2, 2024.
The petitioners object to the short timeframe given to raise objections to the provisional answer key, with the online portal closing on December 3 at 4 pm. The CLAT 2025 final answer key is scheduled to be published on December 9 and the results are to be announced on December 10, 2024.
Petitioners seek CLAT 2025 result delay
The petitioners have requested a delay in the publication of the CLAT 2025 results and the counselling process. They also object to the requirement that candidates must pay Rs 12,000 to raise objections to the 12 answers.
"It is submitted that even after charging an exorbitant fee of Rs 4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand Only) towards the examination fees, the Consortium accepted objections only upon payment of Rs 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) per objection," the petition stated.
Alleged CLAT 2025 discrimination
The petitioners further allege that they were not given equal treatment, as they received the sealed envelope containing the question paper and Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) response sheet only after 2 pm, despite being scheduled for 1.50 pm.
The petition contends that the improper conduct of the CLAT exam violated the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21A. The petitioners are represented by Advocates Manasi Bhushan, Shakshi Sharma, Sanjana Patel, Akshit Chaudhary, Chetan and Ankit Chaturvedi (AOR).
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Jindal Global Law School will admit through JSAT Law, an AI exam students can take at any time
LNAT UK Test is mandatory for admission to five-year law programmes. JSAT-Law Test is applicable for all academic programmes of JGLS except the five-year Integrated Law Programme.
Careers360 Connect | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- ‘Cancel admissions’: Jamia Millia students allege lower rank-holders given seats over toppers, protest
- MGR Medical University releases faculty data of 13,000 teaching staff after TN group’s transparency push
- Removing deprivation points from admissions will change JNU’s character, make it elitist: Professor
- Tamil Nadu plans to strengthen Govt college libraries, polytechnics and diploma engineering courses
- ‘No one feels secure’: Jadavpur University ABVP ‘raid’ leaves students scarred, questioning security collapse
- Tagore in the morning, Shakespeare at noon: My Bengali-medium schooling doesn’t hamper my English-medium job
- ‘This is my way of giving back...’: CJP’s Ashutosh Ranka on ‘School Thik Karo’ campaign
- Delhi Private Universities Bill: New regulator, zero standards, minister as visitor; why teachers are wary
- ‘Chowkidar-cum-Gatekeeper’: Why Visva-Bharati’s biotech head won’t enforce order for monthly workload reports
- IIT Placements 2026: Many in BTech Computer Science aim for trading firms, not Google; internships show why