UPPSC Mains Exam Postponed: Allahabad HC orders revision of prelims merit list for 609 posts
Vikas Kumar Pandit | September 26, 2025 | 09:18 AM IST | 2 mins read
OBC candidates who scored higher than general category aspirants should be included in the unreserved list. The court noted that statutory concessions do not block merit-based inclusion. Prelims shortlisting ratio also needs correction.
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) to postpone the mains examination for 609 Group-A and Group-B posts advertised in April 2024. The exam, which was scheduled for September 28, will now be held only after the Commission issues a revised merit list of the preliminary results.
According to the LiveLaw report, Justice Ajit Kumar passed the order while deciding petitions that challenged the preliminary selection list. The direction came while hearing petitions filed by the Other Backwards Classes (OBC) category candidates challenging their exclusion from the unreserved category despite securing higher marks than general category candidates.
“In view of the above, all these petitions succeed and are allowed to the extent that the respondent U.P. Public Service Commission shall re-draw the merit list of the preliminary examination result of suitable candidates to qualify for next stage of final examination for the purposes of selection and appointment against vacancies advertised vide advertisement No. A-3/E-1/2024 dated 10.4.2024 and thereafter only Commission shall be holding main examination on the basis of such revised preliminary examination result,” the court observed.
The recruitment drive covers posts of Assistant Engineer (Civil/Mechanical), District Horticulture Officer, Food Processing Officer, and Senior Technical Assistant in Chemistry, Botany, Agronomy, and Plant Protection.
Shortlisting ratio not followed
The petitioners further argued that the Commission had not followed the 1:15 shortlisting ratio laid down in the recruitment advertisement. Only 7,358 candidates were declared qualified for the mains against 609 posts, while the rules required at least 9,135 candidates.
They further contended that the unreserved category is not an exclusive pool and that OBC candidates meeting or surpassing the general cut-off should have been included in the open category list.
The court, while examining UPPSC’s chart of shortlisted candidates, noted that the prescribed ratio was followed in reserved categories, but fewer candidates were placed in the unreserved list. It clarified that statutory concessions like age relaxation and fee waiver do not prevent meritorious reserved-category candidates from being considered under the open category.
Also read Only 2.47% qualify in West Bengal TET 2023; 64 candidates bag top 10 ranks
Reserved candidates eligible for unreserved list
Citing settled legal principles, the court said: “A candidate may have applied under reserved category but if he is not benefited by any relaxation other than the age and concession in fee at the preliminary examination result, then he can always enter unreserved category not only at the stage of final selection but at the same time when preliminary examination/screening test is held.”
As per LiveLaw , the court further underscored that equality before law requires treating similarly placed candidates alike: “Confining such a candidate to the reserved category only for the reason that list has been published category-wise, would definitely amount to discrimination.”
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- Eye on autonomy, Scottish Church College plans new courses, curriculum, exam system from 2027: Principal
- FMGE 2026: Protest at Jantar Mantar on Monday; examinees demand exam review, facilities on par with NEET
- ‘We became a bridge’: Volunteers crowdfund to send stranded CJP protesters home after Jantar Mantar stir
- SC raps NCAHP, states for not framing regulations, setting up councils for allied health sciences
- ‘Shouldn’t forget’: An AI engineer’s platform is gathering evidence of police violence at CJP protest
- Paper-leak bill won’t help, argue opposition MPs; Priyanka Gandhi questions Pralhad Joshi’s appointment
- NEET Counselling 2026: In NMC’s new rules for PwBD admissions, individualised reports, chance to appeal
- Visva-Bharati professor quits report panel alleging doctored meeting minutes, staff shortage
- Centre sat on a fifth of Samagra Shiksha funds every year; PM SHRI dues at 49% in 2025-26: Govt data
- ‘Greta Thunberg visit not planned’: How SFI UK took the CJP protests to Leeds, London and beyond