UPSC to release provisional civil services answer keys soon after prelims; change follows SC directive
Vikas Kumar Pandit | October 16, 2025 | 11:03 AM IST | 1 min read
The Supreme Court welcomed UPSC’s revised approach to the answer key publication. Candidates can submit evidence-backed objections, which will be reviewed by experts before finalising the key and declaring the prelims results.
UPSC CSE preparation strategy along with best books for prelims as well as mains exam for sure success.
Download EBookSoon after the Civil Services Preliminary Examination, candidates can now expect the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) to release provisional answer keys — a change from its earlier year-long wait policy. The move follows months of hearings in the Supreme Court over the Commission’s earlier lack of transparency.
UPSC IAS 2026: UPSC 2026 Annual Calender
Also See: UPSC IAS Mains QP's (2016-23) | Complete guide
Don't Miss: UPSC CSE Sample Papers
During the proceedings, a Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar recorded appreciation for the UPSC’s revised approach and the role played by senior advocate Jaideep Gupta and advocate Pranjal Kishore in shaping the reform. According to The Hindu , the court said such cooperation reflected “participatory adversarialism” in action.
The Bench said any remaining issues raised by aspirants could be taken to the respective High Courts for a quick decision. Petitioner Himanshu Kumar and others had questioned the logic behind releasing marks, cut-off scores, and answer keys only after the entire exam cycle. As noted by The Hindu , they argued that early publication would allow genuine correction of errors.
Also read WBPSC clerkship result 2023 out on psc.wb.gov.in: 89,821 qualify for part 2 exam
UPSC changes stance on early key release
In its first affidavit filed on May 13, the UPSC opposed the idea, warning it might lead to confusion and delays. But in another affidavit submitted on September 20, the Commission informed the court that it had taken a “conscious and well-considered decision” to release provisional keys soon after the exam, The Hindu reported.
Under the new system, candidates can submit objections backed by at least three reliable sources. Those without sufficient proof will be rejected outright. The UPSC will place all valid objections before subject experts before finalising the key. The prelims results will be based on the approved version, while the final key will continue to be published after the completion of the entire examination process.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Tamil Nadu to hold TET thrice in 2026 after SC’s mandatory eligibility rule; relief for teachers
TNTET 2026: The board will conduct the eligibility test in January, July, and December. Earlier, SC mandated TET for all government teachers to retain their jobs and for promotions.
Vaishnavi Shukla | 1 min readFeatured News
]- Minority Scholarships: Rs 3,400 crore unspent, panel says revive scheme in states ‘with no irregularities’
- Post-Matric Scholarship: Government plans to impose fee cap, raise income limit to Rs 4.5 lakh next year
- NMC to medical colleges: File monthly reports on student suicides, ragging cases, faculty vacancies
- Primary school teachers in Karnataka must serve 12 years before promotion, say new recruitment rules
- Jadavpur University civil engineer’s work on vernacular architecture and climate resilience wins plaudits
- Education Loan: PM-USP scholarships up 31.6% nationally, but J-K and Ladakh see 10.9% drop in 5 years
- Experts propose 7 spots for university townships in education ministry’s post-budget webinar
- Operation Kayakalp: ‘Jarjar’ schools in UP a blind spot – with crumbling buildings and children left behind
- Protest as ‘law and order issue’: Students note pattern of universities filing FIRs to tackle ‘disagreements’
- Maharashtra Budget: Key scholarship scheme loses 82% funds; cuts across schemes for poor students in higher ed