UGC forms fact-finding committee to probe Nepali student's death at KIIT
Suviral Shukla | May 2, 2025 | 08:05 PM IST | 1 min read
KIIT Students Death: Prisa Sah, an eighteen-year-old student was found dead in the same floor of the institution where Prakriti Lamba, another Nepali student died by suicide in February 2025.
NEW DELHI:
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has formed a fact-finding committee to examine the recent death of a Nepali student at the Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT). The move comes after the Nepal government urged the institute and the Government of India to look into the death of the BTech student from Nepal.
Notably, this is the second death of a
Nepali engineering student
at the Odisha-based institution in just
two-and-a-half months
. Prisa Sah, an eighteen-year-old student was found dead in the same floor of the institution where
Prakriti Lamba
, another Nepali student died by suicide in February 2025.
The committee will be submitting a fact-finding report with findings and recommendations within 10 days of this order, the UGC said.
Members of fact-finding committee
The UGC has formed a four member fact-finding committee to look into the students suicide cases at the KIIT .
|
Nageshwar Rao, former vice chancellor, IGNOU |
Chairperson |
|
Shashikala Wanjari, vice chancellor, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA) |
Member |
|
HCS Rathore, former vice chancellor, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya |
Member |
|
Sunita Siwach, joint secretary, UGC |
Coordinating officer |
The committee will be investigating the deaths of two Nepali students at the KIIT as per the following term of reference (ToR).
- Examining institutional policies, academic pressure, grievance redressal mechanism, and student support structures.
- Evaluating institution's mental health support system, such as counselling services, intervention, frameworks, faculty sensitisation programmes, and support initiatives.
- The committee will review safety and security protocols, grievance redressal mechanisms, and anti-harrassment measures.
- They will conduct on-site investigation to verify the exact implementation of student safety and well-being policies.
- Interacting with stakeholders, students, faculty members, administrators, and non teaching staff to assess institutional culture, student experience, and challenges.
- Ensuring that the guidelines are being followed for promotion of physical fitness, sports, student health, welfare, psychological, and emotional well being at the KIIT.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]‘Nobody cares’: Long hours, supervisors’ control add to PhD scholars’ mental health crisis at top institutes
Deaths, protests, inquiries – nothing seems to change things for PhD scholars in India’s top science and tech institutions such as IIT Kanpur, Bombay, Madras, AIIMS, IISERs, IIIT Allahabad.
Sheena Sachdeva | 1 min readFeatured News
]- Minority Scholarships: Rs 3,400 crore unspent, panel says revive scheme in states ‘with no irregularities’
- Post-Matric Scholarship: Government plans to impose fee cap, raise income limit to Rs 4.5 lakh next year
- NMC to medical colleges: File monthly reports on student suicides, ragging cases, faculty vacancies
- Primary school teachers in Karnataka must serve 12 years before promotion, say new recruitment rules
- Jadavpur University civil engineer’s work on vernacular architecture and climate resilience wins plaudits
- Education Loan: PM-USP scholarships up 31.6% nationally, but J-K and Ladakh see 10.9% drop in 5 years
- Experts propose 7 spots for university townships in education ministry’s post-budget webinar
- Operation Kayakalp: ‘Jarjar’ schools in UP a blind spot – with crumbling buildings and children left behind
- Protest as ‘law and order issue’: Students note pattern of universities filing FIRs to tackle ‘disagreements’
- Maharashtra Budget: Key scholarship scheme loses 82% funds; cuts across schemes for poor students in higher ed