Meghalaya: Hundreds of ad-hoc teachers hold protest; demand 5% salary hike, retirement age of 65
Press Trust of India | September 22, 2025 | 06:25 PM IST | 2 mins read
Meghalaya teachers warned that the agitation would continue indefinitely if the government did not respond positively.
SHILLONG: Hundreds of ad hoc school teachers in Meghalaya on Monday held a protest here, demanding regularisation of their services and enhanced pay. The teachers, under the banner of the Federation of All School Teachers of Meghalaya (FASTOM), staged a demonstration in the state capital by walking on foot to press for their demands.
They also accused the state government of failing to deliver assurances made nearly two years ago. The federation is seeking the "immediate transfer of ad hoc teachers to the deficit system, a five per cent annual salary increment, enhancement of retirement age from 60 to 65 years, and implementation of the commitment made by Education Minister Rakkam A Sangma on December 17, 2023," a protesting teacher said.
In Meghalaya , there are government teachers who are directly appointed by the school education department, and 'deficit' teachers whose salaries are partly funded by the state. Ad hoc teachers work on a fixed honorarium without service benefits, besides those appointed in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan schools.
Also read 'Abuse of power': JNU teachers seek VC's removal, write letter to President again
The ad hoc category covers lower and upper primary, secondary and higher secondary teachers, who together form a substantial section of the state's education workforce. Currently, ad hoc teachers are paid Rs 18,000 per month in lower primary schools, Rs 22,000 in upper primary, Rs 29,000 in secondary, Rs 31,000 for science, and Rs 33,000 in higher secondary sections.
Federation of All School Teachers of Meghalaya vice president S Jungai told reporters that the ad hoc teachers were compelled to hit the streets as the government had "failed to act on long-pending promises". "Ad hoc teachers perform the same duties as regular ones but are deprived of benefits. The government must bring in a clear policy to reform the ad hoc system," he said.
He said many teachers have served for decades but continue to draw a meagre salary, unlike their counterparts in the regular system. Jungai warned that the agitation would continue indefinitely if the government did not respond positively. "If the authorities act within a day or two, it will be good. If not, we will be forced to intensify the protest," he added.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Will NEET UG go online? Education ministry again mulls CBT mode for MBBS exam; what we know so far
NEET UG 2026 Exam Date: The high-level expert committee is reviewing whether a mismatch in the difficulty level of NEET UG and Class 12 syllabus is making students heavily rely on coaching centres.
Anu Parthiban | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- Minority Scholarships: Rs 3,400 crore unspent, panel says revive scheme in states ‘with no irregularities’
- Post-Matric Scholarship: Government plans to impose fee cap, raise income limit to Rs 4.5 lakh next year
- NMC to medical colleges: File monthly reports on student suicides, ragging cases, faculty vacancies
- Primary school teachers in Karnataka must serve 12 years before promotion, say new recruitment rules
- Jadavpur University civil engineer’s work on vernacular architecture and climate resilience wins plaudits
- Education Loan: PM-USP scholarships up 31.6% nationally, but J-K and Ladakh see 10.9% drop in 5 years
- Experts propose 7 spots for university townships in education ministry’s post-budget webinar
- Operation Kayakalp: ‘Jarjar’ schools in UP a blind spot – with crumbling buildings and children left behind
- Protest as ‘law and order issue’: Students note pattern of universities filing FIRs to tackle ‘disagreements’
- Maharashtra Budget: Key scholarship scheme loses 82% funds; cuts across schemes for poor students in higher ed