‘Vague and dangerous’: Supreme Court stays UGC equity regulations, warns of social divide
Anu Parthiban | January 29, 2026 | 03:31 PM IST | 1 min read
The Supreme Court says non-intervention in UGC Equity Regulations could have dangerous impact and divide society.
Amid protests demanding a rollback of the UGC equity regulations for excluding general and non-reserved categories from protection against caste-based discrimination, the Supreme Court today stayed the rules, observing that they are "vague" and "capable of misuse".
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that if it does not intervene in the matter, it will lead to a “dangerous impact and divide the society”.
The top court order comes after various pleas were filed contending that the University Grants Commission (UGC) adopted a “non-inclusionary” definition of caste-based discrimination and excluded general and non-reserved categories from institutional protection.
"Issue notice, returnable on March 19. Solicitor General accepts notice.... Meanwhile, let UGC Regulations 2026 shall remain in abeyance and 2012 regulations shall continue," the bench said.
Why the UGC regulation is facing opposition
The University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 , notified on January 13, mandated all higher educational institutions to form “equity committees" to look into discrimination complaints.
These committees must include members of the Other Backward Classes (OBC), the Scheduled Castes (SC), the Scheduled Tribes (ST), persons with disabilities, and women, the rules state.
The new regulation replaces the UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2012, which was largely advisory in nature. Pleas were filed against the new regulations as it limits the scope of caste discrimination to SC, ST, and OBC.
Protesting students, teachers, and political leaders, said this means the UGC has effectively denied institutional protection and grievance redressal to individuals belonging to the "general" or non-reserved categories who may also face harassment or bias based on their caste identity.
The top court was hearing pleas challenging the constitutional validity of UGC Equity Regulations 2026 filed by Mritunjay Tiwari, advocate Vineet Jindal and Rahul Dewan.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Quick Watch
]Next Story
]Featured News
]- SRFTI Kolkata alumni backs students, says police deployment escalated tensions; urges VC to hold talks
- Karnataka coaching centres may face 5-hour daily cap, no under-15 enrolment, Rs 5 lakh fine for violations
- Why was Anbil Mahesh arrested? Tamil Nadu’s Rs 400-crore private school approvals case explained
- After AMU and Jamia, BHU students launch agitation for union polls, on hold for 3 decades
- MUHS Nashik plans 865 new colleges: 51 for MBBS, most in small towns; big push for allied health sciences
- NSO Survey: Nearly 50% of children travelling at least 1 km to school walk, more so in rural areas
- At 7 IITs, 1,495 reserved SC, ST, OBC faculty posts vacant; IIT Kharagpur alone has 710, reveals RTI data
- In a first for NEET UG Counselling, costliest medical colleges slash MBBS fees up to 40% as seats go vacant
- ISRO communication and media scholar India’s sole representative from field in world top 2% scientists list
- Boomerang effect? Jadavpur bookstalls report fourfold rise in sales after Durga Puja attack sparks resistance