UPSC cheating case: Puja Khedkar seeks pre-arrest bail, moves SC
Press Trust of India | January 14, 2025 | 06:45 PM IST | 2 mins read
Puja Khedkar has challenged the December 23 2024 Delhi High Court order which refused to grant her anticipatory bail.
UPSC CSE preparation strategy along with best books for prelims as well as mains exam for sure success.
Download EBookNEW DELHI: Former IAS probationer Puja Khedkar, accused of cheating and wrongly availing OBC and disability quota benefits in the civil services examination, has moved the Supreme Court for anticipatory bail. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma is scheduled to hear the plea on January 15.
UPSC IAS 2026: UPSC 2026 Annual Calender
Also See: UPSC IAS Mains QP's (2016-23) | Complete guide
Don't Miss: UPSC CSE Sample Papers
Khedkar has challenged the December 23 2024 Delhi High Court order which refused to grant her anticipatory bail. The high court said a strong prima facie case was made out against Khedkar and an investigation was required to unearth the "larger conspiracy" to manipulate the system and a pre-arrest bail would adversely impact it.
"Anticipatory bail plea is dismissed. Interim protection from arrest is vacated," the high court said. Khedkar was granted an interim protection from arrest when the high court issued notice on her anticipatory bail plea on August 12, 2024, and it was extended from time to time.
The UPSC examination was the most prestigious test and the case was a classic instance of fraud committed on a constitutional body as well as the society, the high court said. Khedkar is accused of misrepresenting information in her application for the UPSC civil services examination, 2022, to get reservation benefits.
She refuted all the allegations against her. The anticipatory bail plea was opposed by the Delhi Police counsel and the complainant, the UPSC, in the high court. While Khedkar's counsel argued she was willing to join and cooperate in the investigation and as all the material was documentary in nature, her custody was not required, Delhi Police said her custodial interrogation was necessary to unearth the involvement of others.
The UPSC opposed the plea and said Khedkar committed a fraud against it and the public, and her custodial interrogation was necessary to unearth the "magnitude" of the fraud which couldn't have been done without the help of others. The UPSC initiated a series of actions against Khedkar, including lodging of a criminal case, for availing attempts in the civil services exam by faking her identity whereas Delhi Police lodged an FIR for various offences.
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]Featured News
]- ‘Last democratic step’: Why 200 OUAT Bhubaneswar research scholars are on hunger strike
- MBBS Abroad: Indian students in Bangladesh medical colleges safe, but fresh violence keeps them on edge
- Post-Al Falah, Haryana expands control, can shut private universities over national security concerns
- Study in India falls short on visa issues, curricula; NITI Aayog sets 5 lakh foreign students target for 2047
- JEE Advanced reports show IITs cut hundreds of BTech seats in core engineering; here’s what happened
- Exam déjà vu? AMU law faculty reuses last year’s BA LLB Hons question paper; students oppose retest
- Pre, Post-Matric Scholarships for minorities disbursed to thousands of ineligible or fake beneficiaries: CAG
- PMKVY: CAG flags missing names from Skill India scheme, 34 lakh losing payout due to poor NSDC oversight
- ‘IIM Ahmedabad Dubai is the brand ambassador of Indian education system in UAE’: Dean of new campus
- TISS Mumbai: More students seek help for relationship woes than studies; women prefer text, show helpline data