DGHS withdraws directive on 'Dr' prefix for Physiotherapists
Vaishnavi Shukla | September 11, 2025 | 04:46 PM IST | 2 mins read
As per DGHS, the issue arises from the competency-based curriculum published by NCAHP for physiotherapy under the ministry of health and family welfare.
The director general of health services (DGHS) has issued a directive to the National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions (NCAHP) stating physiotherapists are not entitled to use the prefix "Dr" and that it is reserved only for registered medical practitioners. The issue arises from the competency-based curriculum published by NCAHP for physiotherapy under the ministry of health and family welfare (MoHFW).
In a letter to the Indian Medical Association (IMA) president Dilip Bhanushali, DGHS Sunita Sharma said the directorate has received several representations and objections from various organisations, including the Indian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (IAPMR), regarding the use of the prefix "Dr" and suffix "PT" by physiotherapists.
Highlighting the points of concern, Sharma said in the letter that physiotherapists are not trained as medical doctors and, therefore, should not use the prefix "Dr" as it misleads patients and the general public, potentially leading to quackery.
"Physiotherapists should not be permitted to practice primary care and should only treat referred patients as they are not trained to diagnose medical conditions, some of which may worsen with inappropriate physiotherapy intervention," the official statement said.
Also read NCAHP urges adoption of curricula for 10 allied healthcare courses by 2026-27
Recommendation goes against decisions of courts
Sharma also said that this recommendation goes against the decisions made by different courts and the guidelines given by medical councils in the country. She also cited some of the important rulings, including a 2003 judgment of the Patna High Court that held that unless physiotherapists are enrolled in the State Medical Register, they cannot practise modern medicine or use the prefix "Dr".
- A Tamil Nadu Medical Council Advisory (of 2016) has previously warned physiotherapists against using the prefix "Dr", terming them paramedics or technicians.
- A Bengaluru court ruling of 2020 prohibited physiotherapists or occupational therapists from using the prefix "Dr" and emphasised that they must work under physician supervision.
- The Madras High Court (2022) upheld the prohibition on physiotherapists using the prefix "Dr", reiterating that they are not recognised as "doctors" under the IMC Act.
- It is pertinent to mention that the Ethics Committee of the Council (Paramedical and Physiotherapy Central Council) Bill, 2007 had earlier decided that the title "Doctor" (Dr) may only be used by registered practitioners of Modern Medicine, Ayurveda, Homoeopathy, and Unani. No other category of medical professionals, including nursing and paramedical staff, is allowed to use the title, the letter said.
"It is hereby directed that the usage of the prefix 'Dr' for physiotherapists in the Competency Based Curriculum for Physiotherapy Approved Syllabus 2025 be removed forthwith. A more appropriate and respectful title may be considered for graduates and postgraduates of physiotherapy, without causing ambiguity to patients or the public," it added.
With inputs from PTI
Follow us for the latest education news on colleges and universities, admission, courses, exams, research, education policies, study abroad and more..
To get in touch, write to us at news@careers360.com.
Next Story
]NCAHP replaces ‘Paramedical’ with ‘Allied and Healthcare’; urges change in institutional titles
The term ‘Paramedical’ will no longer be used. National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Profession has urged universities and colleges to discontinue the use of ‘Paramedical’ in all official communications, policies, and training programmes.
Anu Parthiban | 2 mins readFeatured News
]- Rice research needs fortification too, say scientists at agriculture universities
- SRCC false caste-bias case: DU college says ‘no such incident’ but video viral amid UGC equity regulations row
- Economic Survey 2026: Upgrade ITI diplomas to degrees to improve jobs, unify apprenticeship schemes
- Economic Survey 2026: Make India ‘education tourism’ hub; offer international students Ayurveda, yoga courses
- Economic Survey 2026 proposes NIRF-like school ranking, PISA-type Class 10 test, more composite schools
- From Rohith to Reform: UGC Equity Regulations 2026, born from tragedies, threaten caste dominance, not merit
- Law School For All: IGNOU is drawing lawyers, cops, CAs, even sitting judges with revamped legal courses
- ‘Autonomy Snatched’: Revised ISI Bill faces opposition in council; academics reject new MoSPI draft
- What are UGC Equity Regulations 2026 and why are they facing ‘general-category’ backlash?
- NITs plan multiple-entry, exit in BTech across institutes, research parks with ADB loan, PhD reform